W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > May 2012

Re: no value for adapted leading contained in test procedure

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 14:53:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHu5OWZ0_3jR8QgD8EGaFKoPNN2Et7Zaa5hc4bzjEbWMLMcY5w@mail.gmail.com>
To: detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:01 AM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote:

> Name: Detlev Fischer
> Email: detlev.fischer@testkreis.de
> Affiliation: 3needs
> Document: TD
> Item Number: G188
> Part of Item: Tests
> Comment Type: technical
> Summary of Issue: no value for adapted leading contained in test procedure
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> The test procedure does not require that the increased leading achieved by
> using the mechanism is actually better than 1.5 (150%). A value is only
> included for in-between paragraph space.
>
> Proposed Change:
> Chenage #3 of test procedure:
>
> "3. Check that the feature increases the line height to at least 1.5
> (150%)"
>
> An added comment reg. 'feature': The test uses first 'button or link',
> then refers to either of these as 'feature'. Other tests simply use
> 'mechanism'.
>
> ================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
Thank you, we have edited the test procedure as you suggested. We agree
that this technique might have been written more generally in terms of a
mechanism, but since it specifically calls for a button or link, we are
using those terms consistently now.

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Thursday, 24 May 2012 21:54:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:15 UTC