On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:41 PM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote: > > Name: Makoto Ueki > Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com > Affiliation: WAIC (Japan) / Infoaxia, Inc. > Document: TD > Item Number: FLASH26 > Part of Item: Related Techniques > Comment Type: question > Summary of Issue: Why G178 ? > Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change): > Is "G178: Providing controls on the Web page that allow users to > incrementally change the size of all text on the page up to 200 percent" a > Related Technique? > > Proposed Change: > Remove G178. > > ================================ Response from the Working Group ================================ Thank you for catching this. We haveremoved G173, which is what we believe you meant. Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working GroupReceived on Monday, 28 November 2011 20:08:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:14 UTC