W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-comments-wcag20@w3.org > November 2011

Re: Why G178 ?

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 12:07:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHu5OWZNZGOQuc5C8TMOgAo8EBFMeeWg--zjJe1zjJSn5PikRQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
Cc: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 11:41 PM, <noreply@w3.org> wrote:

>
> Name: Makoto Ueki
> Email: makoto.ueki@gmail.com
> Affiliation: WAIC (Japan) / Infoaxia, Inc.
> Document: TD
> Item Number: FLASH26
> Part of Item: Related Techniques
> Comment Type: question
> Summary of Issue: Why G178 ?
> Comment (Including rationale for any proposed change):
> Is "G178: Providing controls on the Web page that allow users to
> incrementally change the size of all text on the page up to 200 percent" a
> Related Technique?
>
> Proposed Change:
> Remove G178.
>
> ================================
Response from the Working Group
================================
Thank you for catching this. We haveremoved G173, which is what we believe
you meant.

Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair
Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact


On behalf of the WCAG Working Group
Received on Monday, 28 November 2011 20:08:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:11:14 UTC