- From: aurélien levy <aurelien.levy@temesis.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 15:35:02 +0200
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4C03BB06.9010001@temesis.com>
Hi, I sought an official response about the prohibition (or not) of pixel font-sizing in wcag 2.0. (like with font-size: 12px in CSS) For now, IE still doesn't scale if we just speak about font size and not a zoom feature. As far as I know, I didn't see any failures prohibiting it, except for the F80 for form fields (F69 isn't applicable as if I use pixel the text didn't resize). In my opinion if your intend was to prohibiting pixel font sizes on a AAA level, in the 1.4.8 sufficient techniques there is two gaps : - a missing G142 like sufficient technique saying "Using a technology that has commonly-available user agents that support zoom and does not require the user to scroll horizontally to read a line of text" (like with the small screen rendering mode in Opera browser). - a failure saying "Failure of Success Criterion 1.4.8 due to using pixel for font sizes in CSS or a technology that has commonly-available user agents that support zoom that DO require the user to scroll horizontally to read a line of text if your intend was to prohibiting pixel font sizes on a AA level : - change the G142 techniques to "Using a technology that has user agents that support zoom" this way I can use this techniques only if I am on a environment where I can be 100% sure that every users have an user agents that support zoom - add a failure saying "Failure of Success Criterion 1.4.4 due to using pixel for font sizes in CSS and NOT using a technology that has user agents that support zoom" or "Failure of Success Criterion 1.4.4 when text do not resize when visually rendered text is resized up to 200%" if your intend wasn't to prohibiting pixel font sizes at all there is nothing to add but I need an official statement about that Best regards, Aurélien Levy ---- Temesis
Received on Monday, 31 May 2010 13:35:40 UTC