- From: Sailesh Panchang <spanchang02@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 20:29:02 -0700 (PDT)
- To: public-comments-wcag20@w3.org
There is no difference between 2.1.1 and 2.1.3 if a Web page does not contain content that uses analogue input (i.e. the underlying function requires input that depends on the path of the user's movement and not just the endpoints). Question: a. If all functionality on such a Web page is keyboard-accessible, does it automatically meet AAA SC 2.1.3? b. Conversely, can one argue that making such a Web page keyboard-accessible is only a “AAA” requirement and disregard it as a “A” level requirement? If the answer to (a) is “Yes” and (b) above is “No”, I feel that The reason for repeating the requirement at 2.1.3 is unclear or even futile. In that event I reiterate that 2.1.3 be dropped and 2.1.1 be re-stated as: SC2.1.1: All functionality of the content is operable through a keyboard interface without requiring specific timings for individual keystrokes. This does not apply to content that uses analogue input (i.e. the underlying function requires input that depends on the path of the user's movement and not just the endpoints). (I recall I had made this suggestion to TIETAC too). Sailesh Panchang Email spanchang02@yahoo.com Tel 571-344-1765
Received on Sunday, 18 May 2008 03:29:44 UTC