RE: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Working Draft of December, 2007

Dear WCAG WG, 

We are satisfied with your resolution for this issue.
Thank you very much.

Regards,
 CI.

_______________

Carlos Iglesias

Fundación CTIC
Parque Científico-Tecnológico de Gijón
33203 - Gijón, Asturias, España

teléfono: +34 984291212
fax: +34 984390612
email: carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org
URL: http://www.fundacionctic.org


> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Loretta Guarino Reid [mailto:lorettaguarino@google.com]
> Enviado el: sábado, 22 de marzo de 2008 0:21
> Para: Carlos Iglesias
> CC: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
> Asunto: Re: Your comments on WCAG 2.0 Last Call Working Draft of December,
> 2007
> 
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Carlos Iglesias
> <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org> wrote:
> >  > Comment 9: Conformance logos
> >
> > > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-
> >  > wcag20/2008Feb/0055.html
> >
> > > (Issue ID: 2506)
> >  > Status: VERIFIED / PARTIAL/OTHER
> >  > ----------------------------
> >  > Original Comment:
> >  > ----------------------------
> >  >
> >  > There is no mention to WCAG conformance logos. Is there any plan to
> >  > create WCAG 2.0 conformance logos?
> >  >
> >  > If so, how is going to be the relation between logos and conformance
> >  > claims?
> >  >
> >  > Once you use the logo, are you required to make a conformance claim?
> >  >
> >  > Proposed Change:
> >  > Logos, if any, should be treated as conformance claims and the
> >  > provision of the same information must be required.
> >  >
> >  > ---------------------------------------------
> >  > Response from Working Group:
> >  > ---------------------------------------------
> >  >
> >  > There are currently no plans for a conformance logo. However, if one
> >  > is used, it would constitute a claim and should be accompanied by the
> >  > information described in "Required components of a conformance
> claim."
> >
> >  We just think people will create their own WCAG 2 conformance logos
> even if WAI don't provide them. If a logo ("official" or not) says "WCAG
> 2.0 AA" we understand this as a conformance claim, and we think it would
> be nice to include an explicit note with a clarification like:
> >
> >  "If a logo is used, it would constitute a claim and should be
> accompanied by the same information required for any other conformance
> claim."
> >
> 
> We have added your suggested note to the Conformance Claims section.
> WAI is now considering the creation of conformance logos.

Received on Monday, 31 March 2008 12:11:50 UTC