- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 16:20:47 -0700
- To: "Carlos Iglesias" <carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org>
- Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Carlos Iglesias
<carlos.iglesias@fundacionctic.org> wrote:
> > Comment 9: Conformance logos
>
> > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-
> > wcag20/2008Feb/0055.html
>
> > (Issue ID: 2506)
> > Status: VERIFIED / PARTIAL/OTHER
> > ----------------------------
> > Original Comment:
> > ----------------------------
> >
> > There is no mention to WCAG conformance logos. Is there any plan to
> > create WCAG 2.0 conformance logos?
> >
> > If so, how is going to be the relation between logos and conformance
> > claims?
> >
> > Once you use the logo, are you required to make a conformance claim?
> >
> > Proposed Change:
> > Logos, if any, should be treated as conformance claims and the
> > provision of the same information must be required.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > Response from Working Group:
> > ---------------------------------------------
> >
> > There are currently no plans for a conformance logo. However, if one
> > is used, it would constitute a claim and should be accompanied by the
> > information described in "Required components of a conformance claim."
>
> We just think people will create their own WCAG 2 conformance logos even if WAI don't provide them. If a logo ("official" or not) says "WCAG 2.0 AA" we understand this as a conformance claim, and we think it would be nice to include an explicit note with a clarification like:
>
> "If a logo is used, it would constitute a claim and should be accompanied by the same information required for any other conformance claim."
>
We have added your suggested note to the Conformance Claims section.
WAI is now considering the creation of conformance logos.
Received on Friday, 21 March 2008 23:21:28 UTC