- From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:29:21 +0100
- To: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
Hi Loretta et al. Loretta Guarino Reid schrieb: > Before we > proceed to implementation, we would like to know whether we have > understood your comments correctly and whether you are satisfied with > our resolutions. Yes, I'm satisfied with your resolutions of the issues listed below. > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 1: missing failure list for SC 2.1.2 including F10 > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0048.html > (Issue ID: 2370) > Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > No list of common failures, whereas the Techniques document has F10 > for failing sc2.1.2 > > Proposed Change: > add list of common failures listing F10 > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > Thank you. We have fixed this error. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 2: missing failure list for SC 3.3.2 including F82 > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0049.html > (Issue ID: 2371) > Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > No list of common failures, whereas the Techniques document has F82 > for failing sc3.3.2 > > Proposed Change: > add list of common failures listing F82 > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > Thank you. We have fixed this error. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 3: Wrong number for Understanding 1.4.7, Sufficient Techniques > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0041.html > (Issue ID: 2363) > Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > Numbering in the headline is wrong: "Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.6", > must be 1.4.7 > > Proposed Change: > "Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.6" -> "Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.7" > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > Thank you. We have fixed this error. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 4: technique G140 listed under failures > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0047.html > (Issue ID: 2369) > Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > "Failures for SC 1.3.1" lists technique G140 > > Proposed Change: > remove G140 from list of failures > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > Thank you. We have corrected this error. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 5: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.9 Advisory Techniques > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0046.html > (Issue ID: 2368) > Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > Numbering is wrong: "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.8", must be 1.4.9 > > Proposed Change: > "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.8" -> "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.9" > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > Thank you. We have fixed this error. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 6: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.7 Advisory Techniques > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0042.html > (Issue ID: 2364) > Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > Numbering is wrong: "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.6", must be 1.4.7 > > Proposed Change: > "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.6" -> "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7" > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > Thank you. We have fixed this error. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 7: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.8 Sufficient Techniques > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0043.html > (Issue ID: 2365) > Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > Numbering is wrong: "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7", must be 1.4.8 > > Proposed Change: > "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7" -> "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.8" > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > Thank you. We have fixed this error. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 8: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.8 Advisory Techniques > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0043.html > (Issue ID: 2366) > Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > Numbering is wrong: "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7", must be 1.4.8 > > Proposed Change: > "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.7" -> "Advisory Techniques for 1.4.8" > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > Thank you. We have fixed this error. > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Comment 9: Wrong numbering for Understanding 1.4.9 Sufficient Techniques > Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007Dec/0045.html > (Issue ID: 2367) > Status: VERIFIED / ACCEPTED > ---------------------------- > Original Comment: > ---------------------------- > > Numbering is wrong: Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.8", must be 1.4.9 > > Proposed Change: > Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.8" -> Sufficient Techniques for 1.4.9" > > --------------------------------------------- > Response from Working Group: > --------------------------------------------- > > Thank you. We have fixed this error. > -- Johannes Koch In te domine speravi; non confundar in aeternum. (Te Deum, 4th cent.)
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 08:29:31 UTC