- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lorettaguarino@google.com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 21:08:44 -0700
- To: "Andy Webb" <andyw@succ-olds.com>
- Cc: public-comments-WCAG20@w3.org
Dear Andy Webb, Thank you for your comments on the 17 May 2007 Public Working Draft of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0 http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-WCAG20-20070517/). The WCAG Working Group has reviewed all comments received on the May draft, and will be publishing an updated Public Working Draft shortly. Before we do that, we would like to know whether we have understood your comments correctly, and also whether you are satisfied with our resolutions. Please review our resolutions for the following comments, and reply to us by 19 November 2007 at public-comments-wcag20@w3.org to say whether you are satisfied. Note that this list is publicly archived. Note also that we are not asking for new issues, nor for an updated review of the entire document at this time. Please see below for the text of comments that you submitted and our resolutions to your comments. Each comment includes a link to the archived copy of your original comment on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/, and may also include links to the relevant changes in the WCAG 2.0 Editor's Draft of May-October 2007 at http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-WCAG20-20071102/ Thank you for your time reviewing and sending comments. Though we cannot always do exactly what each commenter requests, all of the comments are valuable to the development of WCAG 2.0. Regards, Loretta Guarino Reid, WCAG WG Co-Chair Gregg Vanderheiden, WCAG WG Co-Chair Michael Cooper, WCAG WG Staff Contact On behalf of the WCAG Working Group ---------------------------------------------------------- Comment 1: The word "England" is used where a more appropriate term would be "the UK" Source: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-comments-wcag20/2007May/0130.html (Issue ID: 1932) ---------------------------- Original Comment: ---------------------------- re: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20070517/Overview.html#seizure-does-not-violate The word "England" is used where a more appropriate term would be "the UK". (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Isles_%28terminology%29) i.e. "This success criterion is based on existing specifications in use in England and by others for television broadcast..." should be changed to "This success criterion is based on existing specifications in use in the UK and by others for television broadcast..." --------------------------------------------- Response from Working Group: --------------------------------------------- We have updated the draft as proposed.
Received on Sunday, 4 November 2007 04:08:55 UTC