That was just the context of the discussion in yesterday's meeting, where I mentioned this issue:
https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/issues/384
We should certainly also include image formats.
Chris
From: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>
Sent: 26 October 2021 13:17
To: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>; public-colorweb@w3.org
Subject: Re: Exposing HDR metadata in bitstreams through WebCodecs API
Why only video codec bitstreams? Why wouldn't we also want/need to expose this information for raster image formats as well?
Leonard
From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com<mailto:pal@sandflow.com>>
Date: Monday, October 25, 2021 at 6:39 PM
To: public-colorweb@w3.org<mailto:public-colorweb@w3.org> <public-colorweb@w3.org<mailto:public-colorweb@w3.org>>
Subject: Exposing HDR metadata in bitstreams through WebCodecs API
Good morning/evening,
It was pointed out earlier today that now would be a good time to
identify any HDR/WCG metadata present at the video codec bitstream
level (as opposed to metadata at the container level), so that the
metadata can be exposed through the WebCodecs API.
Please reply to this thread if any such metadata comes to mind.
Best,
-- Pierre