- From: Chris Cunningham <chcunningham@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 15:21:16 -0700
- To: Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com>, "public-colorweb@w3.org" <public-colorweb@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CALG6eSq9mHOqW23HPHVewvHKcJeYcPA4Z69Wv3C0McQJ+BBc9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Group, I co-edit the WebCodecs spec and I keep an eye on this list :). ImageDecoder is firmly part of our plans. The interface <https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/WICG/web-codecs/pull/152.html#image-decoding> in the PR <https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/pull/152> is already implemented in Chrome as part of the WebCodecs origin trial <https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs#try-it-out-in-chrome-86>. We welcome your feedback! Feel free to continue discussing in github <https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/issues/159#issuecomment-815242049>, filing new issues as needed. Best, Chris On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 6:15 AM Chris Needham <chris.needham@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > I agree, and I mentioned our CG’s work in this WebCodecs issue on > createImageBitmap and VideoFrame: > > > > https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/issues/159#issuecomment-815237500 > > > > Image decoding has been discussed and there is an ImageDecoder proposal in > progress. > > > > https://github.com/w3c/webcodecs/issues/50 > > https://github.com/dalecurtis/image-decoder-api/blob/master/explainer.md > > > > Although WebCodecs is now in the Media WG, it seems that ImageDecoder > isn’t in WICG as yet. > > > > Chris > > > > *From:* Leonard Rosenthol <lrosenth@adobe.com> > *Sent:* 08 April 2021 13:51 > *To:* public-colorweb@w3.org > *Subject:* WebCodecs and color? > > > > I noticed the announcement today ( > https://www.w3.org/blog/news/archives/9003) about the publishing of a > FPWD of WebCodecs (https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/WD-webcodecs-20210408/). > My initial reaction was that this seemed like the solution to one of the > problems we were discussing in our last meeting – how client-side code > could leverage the existing image encoders/decoders in the UA. Is anyone > here a part of that group and could bring to them the idea of adding raster > image codecs to the mix as well? > > > > In actually looking at the spec, with an eye towards color & HDR in Video > encoding/decoding, everything seems to come down to the VideoFrame ( > https://www.w3.org/TR/2021/WD-webcodecs-20210408/#videoframe) – which is > a bit of a wrapper around our good friend ImageBitmap ( > https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/imagebitmap-and-animations.html#imagebitmap) > that we HAVE been discussing vis-à-vis the implications of our proposed HDR > changes. > > > > Seems like we should, if it’s not already happening, connect up with this > group to make sure that our HDR proposals – especially in terms of proposed > API changes – don’t break their work…and also that perhaps we could > collaborate on aspects such as the initial comment above. > > > > Leonard > > >
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2021 22:22:10 UTC