- From: Pierre-Anthony Lemieux <pal@sandflow.com>
- Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 11:26:43 -0700
- To: Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-colorweb@w3.org
Hi Peter, As mentioned in Ref. 1, "These equations are not provided in IEC 61966-2-1, and are an additional interpretation provided in this document." There is no justification for these equations, and I would therefore disregard them until someone provides one :) Best, -- Pierre On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com> wrote: > That is actually only the case once XYZ is "normalized", so that Y = 0 is > the (sRGB) black point and Y = 1 is the white point. > > However, the document I previously linked to (which is actually from the ICC > and at ref. 1), at section A.6, suggests that XYZ values are normalized > taking into account the veiling glare luminance ("black point" luminance) > (in addition to the white point luminance), rather than taking into account > just the white point luminance, which I presumed was the case until now. > (Note that each of the two normalizations will result in a different meaning > for Y = 0.) Hence my question on what luminance (either 0 or 0.2 cd/m^2) > sRGB's "black point" is. > > Ref. 1. http://www.color.org/chardata/rgb/sRGB.pdf > > > > On 09/03/2017 01:00 PM, Pierre-Anthony Lemieux wrote: >>> >>> Is it true that the "sRGB black point" (what sRGB defines as black) has >>> a luminance of 0.2 cd/m^2 (absolute Y = 0.2) >>> rather than 0 cd/m^2 (absolute Y = 0, the start of the absolute XYZ >>> scale)? >> >> ISO 61966-2-1 [1] specifies that [X Y Z] = [0 0 0] yields [R G B] = >> [0 0 0] (see equation 8). >> >> Furthermore, quantized 8-bit R8 = 255 R' , where R' is non-linear R, >> (see equation 4) >> >> and R' = 12.92 R when R' < 0.04045. (see equation 5) >> >> ... so R8 = 0 when [X Y Z] = [0 0 0] , with the same reasoning >> applying to G8 and B8. >> >> Let me know if I got this wrong. >> >> Best, >> >> -- Pierre >> >> [1] https://webstore.iec.ch/publication/6169 >> >> On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Peter Occil <poccil14@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> While I'm at it, that document contains a very questionable statement >>> about >>> the "black point" of sRGB, suggesting that the "black point" has a >>> "veiling >>> glare luminance" of 0.2 cd/m^2 (and indeed that suggestion appears >>> further >>> in some of the formulas in that document). Is it true that the "sRGB >>> black >>> point" (what sRGB defines as black) has a luminance of 0.2 cd/m^2 >>> (absolute >>> Y = 0.2) rather than 0 cd/m^2 (absolute Y = 0, the start of the absolute >>> XYZ >>> scale)? >>> >>> >>> >>> On 09/02/2017 03:28 PM, Peter Occil wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm aware of the following document posted on the W3C Web site: >>>> >>>> https://www.w3.org/Graphics/Color/srgb >>>> >>>> I find it very useful as a reference, but: Where did this document come >>>> from? Who were its authors? When was it posted? I couldn't find it >>>> linked >>>> anywhere on the W3C site except on a mailing list message (ref. 1). >>>> >>>> Ref. 1. https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2016Sep/0061.html >>>> >>> >
Received on Sunday, 3 September 2017 18:27:31 UTC