Re: Review of documents

Hi Steve

Comments inline



All the best

Lisa 
---- On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 15:10:39 +0300 Steve Lee <stevelee@w3.org> wrote ----


Hi 
 
I did another pass through the Design Guide and Content Usable docs. 
Most comments are thoughts for the next iteration. 
 
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tzj0YjBr6i61rxwr1uiAU5Q_nA6eGXeILoSpPGDK818/edit?usp=sharing 
 
However, I think the following should be addressed before we publish 
 
# Content Usable  
 
* Remove ednotes  -Yes we all agreed this needs to be done
* Remove Empty “Status of This Document” section  - no, W3C staff need to add it
* Update Acknowledgements -Yes we all agreed this needs to be done
* Add Roy Ran & Steve Lee to editors?  - this is a decision of the W3C, one w3c editor is usual. Lets discuss on the coodination call
 
# Design Guide (and Appendix of CU) 
 
We’ve mostly done enough now with PR 94 https://github.com/w3c/coga/pull/94 
 
* Some Pattern Examples do not have failures - does it matter? I think no  - next iteration we can discuss this
* Graphical Indicators - I'm not convinced the diagram is make the point 
clearly. - next iteration we can discuss this
* Fix "find from bbc gel"  - yes, this is a note to add content. add to the todo ist for next itteration
* Fix "zn" 
* Fix "See GOV.UK"  - cannot link to live sites 
* same Example for Use Clear Words and Use a simple tense and written 
language - and should the Patterns be merged? - if this is important to you you can add as discussion or issue for next iteration 
* remove "Note that “white space” is a term that means the background 
color. It does not always need to be always white! "? - if this is important to you you can add as discussion or issue for next iteration . we added this text on porpouse
* 5.11.2 7.3.3 incorrect bold use and using bullets - worth fixing now


ls: thanks so much
 
Steve