- From: David Burns <dburns@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:39:39 +0100
- To: Simon Stewart <simon.m.stewart@gmail.com>
- CC: public-browser-tools-testing@w3.org
The original agenda that we agreed on was to do a lot of the conformance tests on the Tuesday. I would like to keep that since that is extremely important to the work we are doing. As for the rest I am happy to do. I am particularly interested in the Shadow DOM stuff as I have brought that up with you in the past. David On 19/10/2012 13:12, Simon Stewart wrote: > Hi, > > I thought it might be a good idea to go into our meetings on Monday > and Tuesday at TPAC with a (rough, easy to modify, not-set-in-stone) > agenda of topics we want to cover. Mine would include: > > * Interoperability > (the spec is very loose on this, but interop is vital) > * Writing the conformance suite > (my preference is to use the JSON/HTTP protocol to help ensure interop) > * Internationalised input (do we need the IME methods from OSS > webdriver? Our current solution is very desktop-centric) > * Possibly adding an ARIA locator > * Handling the shadow DOM > * Do we use strings or numbers for status codes > (there are arguments either way) > * Identifying areas of the webdriver spec that better belong elsewhere > * Any queries raised by implementors > > I'm guessing that there will be some time to spare. If that is the > case, it would be great to collaborate on writing the spec itself, or > working on the conformance tests. > > Regards, > > Simon
Received on Friday, 19 October 2012 12:40:13 UTC