W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bpwg@w3.org > July 2008

RE: ACTION-798: Work proposed changes into the mobileOK Pro document and then turn it over to the group

From: Jose Manrique Lopez de la Fuente <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:11:11 +0200
Message-ID: <09700B613C4DD84FA9F2FEA521882819F7E591@ayalga.fundacionctic.org>
To: "Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich" <k.scheppe@telekom.de>, <public-bpwg@w3.org>
Hello,

I would like to remember some comments we have made about the document[1]. These comments could be discussed to bring the final doc to the public.

Thanks and best regards,

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-pro/2008Jun/0005.html

---
José Manrique López de la Fuente <manrique.lopez@fundacionctic.org>
Área de Tecnología
Fundación CTIC
Web: http://www.fundacionctic.org
Tel: (+34) 984 29 12 12
Parque Científico Tecnológico de Gijón
Edificio Centros Tecnológicos
Cabueñes s/n 
33203 GIJÓN - ASTURIAS - ESPAÑA



-----Mensaje original-----
De: public-bpwg-request@w3.org en nombre de Scheppe, Kai-Dietrich
Enviado el: jue 31/07/2008 16:47
Para: public-bpwg@w3.org
Asunto: ACTION-798: Work proposed changes into the mobileOK Pro document and then turn it over to the group
 
Hi,
 
Having looked at the minutes from Sophia 
http://www.w3.org/2008/06/18-bpwg-minutes.html
 
I see very little to do for this action.
 
 
One issue that was raised 

ISSUE-266




Which mobileOK Pro tests needs the DDC and which don't?

 http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/266
<http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/issues/266>  
 
covers the effect of using or not using a DDC on repeatability.
 
Since that has been called into question from the beginning and led to
moving mobileOK Pro to a note, I see no reason to change this.
The text in the tests explaines what needs to be done and since there is
no consequence to doing a test different it is up to the tester to
decide if the results or methods are satisfactory.
I have moved to close the issue.
 
 
Beyond that we looked at some tests, there was open discussion but no
discernible todos are to be found.
No resolutions or actions on me.
 
In the end we resolved to make it a note.
 
 
 
Unless somebody disagrees, I will consider this action done.
 
 
The document has been converted into a Working Group Note.
I am including a version of the document where I have removed all
comments and made the necessary CSS changes.
 
-- Kai
 
 
Received on Thursday, 31 July 2008 15:14:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:57 UTC