Re: Comments on mobileOK Basic 20070928 draft ( LC-1896 LC-1897 LC-1898 LC-1899 LC-1900 LC-1901 LC-1902 LC-1903 LC-1904 LC-1905 LC-1906 LC-1907 LC-1908 LC-1909)

On 10/25/07, Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
> > Working Group Resolution (LC-1897):
> > Yes, we will clarify that tests should proceed on 1xx (weird as that is)
> > or 2xx responses. The last lines of this section indicate that most 4xx
> > and 5xx responses will FAIL.
>
> The resolution is about my first issue (carrying out further tests). Is
> there another resolution about the second issue (updating the resource
> size/count totals)?

There was not a change from this point. I believe the text describes
the process as intended. The test says when totals should be updated
and this implies they are not when the test doesn't say they are
updated. I would not want to write lines like "else do nothing".


> The HTTP method itself is not case-sensitive, but the attribute value in
> XHTML whatever version is. HTML OTOH is not case-sensitive. So you may
> want to keep "GET" case-insensitive. In any case I would prefer a
> lower-case "get", as you seem to also want XHTML (Basic/Mobile) compliance.

OK I will add this change.

Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 15:35:17 UTC