Re: Comments on mobileOK Basic 20070928 draft ( LC-1896 LC-1897 LC-1898 LC-1899 LC-1900 LC-1901 LC-1902 LC-1903 LC-1904 LC-1905 LC-1906 LC-1907 LC-1908 LC-1909)

Hi Sean

Sean Owen schrieb:
> On 10/25/07, Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
>>> Working Group Resolution (LC-1897):
>>> Yes, we will clarify that tests should proceed on 1xx (weird as that is)
>>> or 2xx responses. The last lines of this section indicate that most 4xx
>>> and 5xx responses will FAIL.
>> The resolution is about my first issue (carrying out further tests). Is
>> there another resolution about the second issue (updating the resource
>> size/count totals)?
> 
> There was not a change from this point. I believe the text describes
> the process as intended. The test says when totals should be updated
> and this implies they are not when the test doesn't say they are
> updated. I would not want to write lines like "else do nothing".

I thought it could be consistent as you also note when not to carry out 
tests. But now it is clear, at least to me.

>> The HTTP method itself is not case-sensitive, but the attribute value in
>> XHTML whatever version is. HTML OTOH is not case-sensitive. So you may
>> want to keep "GET" case-insensitive. In any case I would prefer a
>> lower-case "get", as you seem to also want XHTML (Basic/Mobile) compliance.
> 
> OK I will add this change.

Thanks.
-- 
Johannes Koch
BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT
Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Phone: +49-2241-142628    Fax: +49-2241-142065

Received on Friday, 26 October 2007 17:41:13 UTC