- From: Johannes Koch <johannes.koch@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:50:35 +0200
- To: mike@w3.org
- Cc: public-bpwg-comments@w3.org
Thanks for dealing with my comments. I agree with your resolutions apart from the following two. mike@w3.org schrieb: > ===== > Your comment on 2.4.3 HTTP Response: >> * The algorithm does specify whether tests have to be carried out on >> responses with 3xx, 401, 404, 407 and 5xx status codes. Is does _not_ >> specify whether tests have to be carried out on responses with 1xx, 2xx >> >> and 4xx (other than 401, 404 and 407). >> >> It does specifiy whether the resource size/count totals have to be >> updated for 3xx, 401, 407 status codes. Is does _not_ specify whether >> the resource size/count totals have to be updated for 1xx, 2xx, 4xx >> (other than 401 and 407) and 5xx status codes. > > > Working Group Resolution (LC-1897): > Yes, we will clarify that tests should proceed on 1xx (weird as that is) > or 2xx responses. The last lines of this section indicate that most 4xx > and 5xx responses will FAIL. The resolution is about my first issue (carrying out further tests). Is there another resolution about the second issue (updating the resource size/count totals)? > ---- > > Your comment on 2.4.7 Linked Resources: >> * "GET" -> "get" >> Or is it meant case-insensitively? > > > Working Group Resolution (LC-1900): > The method is not case-sensitive, yes. I will clarify. The HTTP method itself is not case-sensitive, but the attribute value in XHTML whatever version is. HTML OTOH is not case-sensitive. So you may want to keep "GET" case-insensitive. In any case I would prefer a lower-case "get", as you seem to also want XHTML (Basic/Mobile) compliance. -- Johannes Koch BIKA Web Compliance Center - Fraunhofer FIT Schloss Birlinghoven, D-53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany Phone: +49-2241-142628 Fax: +49-2241-142065
Received on Thursday, 25 October 2007 11:51:54 UTC