Re: Abstract for UKON poster (about the specification)

Hi

On 1 Mar 2018, at 16:46, Philippe <proccaserra@gmail.com<mailto:proccaserra@gmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Justin, Leyla, Alasdair

Either of those solutions are good, and there is no discussion that Leyla should be the author for a submission presenting the bioschema protein component.
For the UKON submission,   which is meant to introduce/present the whole bioschema efforts, i feel that having the lead of each group (http://bioschemas.org/groups/) acknowledged as author would be fairer on these people.
If this is too long a list, then Justin's solution is straight to point and indeed shows that the work is done by a community, a group of like minded folks doing the leg work.

I think that Leyla’s point that it is useful for the event organisers to have a point of contact and visible person at the event is important.

For the UKON, there is no associated proceedings, so can we go with the proposal of the person presenting and the Bioschemas Community?

For the planned journal paper we will consult widely for the authorship list, but the intention is to involve everyone who has contributed to the community.

We already had the issue of publications on the agenda for the next management group meeting, but we will now extend this to cover authorship issues as well.

Alasdair

I hope this clarifies my comment.

Cheers

Philippe


On 01/03/2018 16:31, LJ Garcia Castro wrote:

I have also seen one explicit author (the submitter) or a few (those directly contributing to the writing and the actual poster) and then the community. the idea behind an explicit author is to make it easier for people looking at the paper to address the person right next to it.

Regards,

On 01/03/2018 16:28, Justin Clark-Casey wrote:
An approach I've seen on some other papers is just to put "The Bioschemas Community" as the single author with no named individuals.  Perhaps this would also be suitable for a poster where a list of official authors has not yet been agreed.

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:14 PM, LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk<mailto:ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>> wrote:

Hi Pete, all,

Thanks for the comments and contributions.

Just for posters, just some few authors seem enough for me. However, I am happy to add more as needed so I will go with any list of authors agreed by the community. Could please Alasdair, Rafael or Carole point to the official list of authors that should be used for posters? Also, what would be page to use as a link to the community?

I need to submit tonight as tomorrow I am flying. So, I would be grateful if you can provide that information as soon as possible.

If no agreement about authors is reached on time, should I better stop the submission or submit as it is?

Kind regards,

On 01/03/2018 14:52, Peter McQuilton wrote:

Hi Leyla,

I've added a few edits. I'm not sure about authorship though. The abstract is pretty broad, so I wonder whether you shouldn't include more authors from the other specifications as well. I know this came up on Alasdair's abstract as well, and I have to say I agree with Philippe's assertion that representatives from the other specifications should also be included, along with (somewhere), a link to the communities page listed all the contributors.

Best,

Pete

On 01/03/2018 10:49, LJ Garcia Castro wrote:
Dear all,

This [1] is the abstract I will submit to UKON corresponding to Bioschemas specification. It is mainly based on the work carried last year during the BioHackathon and later adopted during the October Bioschemas meeting.

Regards,

[1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbYg7gk24s9kC33bELKulPMQL6OVtnBi8c1XPgQc6hs/edit#




--

Peter McQuilton, PhD

Project Coordinator

FAIRsharing.org<https://fairsharing.org/>

Oxford e-Research Centre

University of Oxford

OX1 3QG, UK


International Society of Biocuration<https://biocuration.org/>

Skype: petemcquilton

Twitter: @drosophilic

ORCID: 0000-0003-2687-1982





Alasdair J G Gray

Fellow of the Higher Education Academy
Assistant Professor in Computer Science,
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
(Athena SWAN Bronze Award)
Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh UK.

Email: A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk<mailto:A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
Web: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ajg33

ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-4872

Office: Earl Mountbatten Building 1.39
Twitter: @gray_alasdair

________________________________

Heriot-Watt University is The Times & The Sunday Times International University of the Year 2018

Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, delivering innovation and educational excellence in business, engineering, design and the physical, social and life sciences.

This email is generated from the Heriot-Watt University Group, which includes:

  1.  Heriot-Watt University, a Scottish charity registered under number SC000278
  2.  Edinburgh Business School a Charity Registered in Scotland, SC026900. Edinburgh Business School is a company limited by guarantee, registered in Scotland with registered number SC173556 and registered office at Heriot-Watt University Finance Office, Riccarton, Currie, Midlothian, EH14 4AS
  3.  Heriot- Watt Services Limited (Oriam), Scotland's national performance centre for sport. Heriot-Watt Services Limited is a private limited company registered is Scotland with registered number SC271030 and registered office at Research & Enterprise Services Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS.

The contents (including any attachments) are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it (including any attachments) from your system.

Received on Thursday, 1 March 2018 17:24:06 UTC