Re: Abstract for UKON poster (about the specification)

Hi Justin, Leyla, Alasdair

Either of those solutions are good, and there is no discussion that 
Leyla should be the author for a submission presenting the bioschema 
protein component.
For the UKON submission,   which is meant to introduce/present the whole 
bioschema efforts, i feel that having the lead of each group 
(http://bioschemas.org/groups/) acknowledged as author would be fairer 
on these people.
If this is too long a list, then Justin's solution is straight to point 
and indeed shows that the work is done by a community, a group of like 
minded folks doing the leg work.

I hope this clarifies my comment.

Cheers

Philippe


On 01/03/2018 16:31, LJ Garcia Castro wrote:
>
> I have also seen one explicit author (the submitter) or a few (those 
> directly contributing to the writing and the actual poster) and then 
> the community. the idea behind an explicit author is to make it easier 
> for people looking at the paper to address the person right next to it.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On 01/03/2018 16:28, Justin Clark-Casey wrote:
>> An approach I've seen on some other papers is just to put "The 
>> Bioschemas Community" as the single author with no named 
>> individuals.  Perhaps this would also be suitable for a poster where 
>> a list of official authors has not yet been agreed.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:14 PM, LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk 
>> <mailto:ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Pete, all,
>>
>>     Thanks for the comments and contributions.
>>
>>     Just for posters, just some few authors seem enough for me.
>>     However, I am happy to add more as needed so I will go with any
>>     list of authors agreed by the community. Could please Alasdair,
>>     Rafael or Carole point to the official list of authors that
>>     should be used for posters? Also, what would be page to use as a
>>     link to the community?
>>
>>     I need to submit tonight as tomorrow I am flying. So, I would be
>>     grateful if you can provide that information as soon as possible.
>>
>>     If no agreement about authors is reached on time, should I better
>>     stop the submission or submit as it is?
>>
>>     Kind regards,
>>
>>
>>     On 01/03/2018 14:52, Peter McQuilton wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi Leyla,
>>>
>>>     I've added a few edits. I'm not sure about authorship though.
>>>     The abstract is pretty broad, so I wonder whether you shouldn't
>>>     include more authors from the other specifications as well. I
>>>     know this came up on Alasdair's abstract as well, and I have to
>>>     say I agree with Philippe's assertion that representatives from
>>>     the other specifications should also be included, along with
>>>     (somewhere), a link to the communities page listed all the
>>>     contributors.
>>>
>>>     Best,
>>>
>>>     Pete
>>>
>>>
>>>     On 01/03/2018 10:49, LJ Garcia Castro wrote:
>>>>     Dear all,
>>>>
>>>>     This [1] is the abstract I will submit to UKON corresponding to
>>>>     Bioschemas specification. It is mainly based on the work
>>>>     carried last year during the BioHackathon and later adopted
>>>>     during the October Bioschemas meeting.
>>>>
>>>>     Regards,
>>>>
>>>>     [1]
>>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbYg7gk24s9kC33bELKulPMQL6OVtnBi8c1XPgQc6hs/edit#
>>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbYg7gk24s9kC33bELKulPMQL6OVtnBi8c1XPgQc6hs/edit#>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>     -- 
>>>
>>>     Peter McQuilton, PhD
>>>
>>>     Project Coordinator
>>>
>>>     FAIRsharing.org <https://FAIRsharing.org>
>>>
>>>     Oxford e-Research Centre
>>>
>>>     University of Oxford
>>>
>>>     OX1 3QG, UK
>>>
>>>
>>>     International Society of Biocuration <https://biocuration.org>
>>>
>>>     Skype: petemcquilton
>>>
>>>     Twitter: @drosophilic
>>>
>>>     ORCID: 0000-0003-2687-1982
>>>
>>
>>
>