- From: Philippe <proccaserra@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:46:11 +0000
- To: LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>, Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com>
- Cc: Peter McQuilton <peter.mcquilton@oerc.ox.ac.uk>, "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>, Carole Goble <carole.goble@manchester.ac.uk>, "Gray, Alasdair J G" <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
- Message-ID: <f6fde1a7-7844-6a6a-b49c-bb10777aa168@gmail.com>
Hi Justin, Leyla, Alasdair Either of those solutions are good, and there is no discussion that Leyla should be the author for a submission presenting the bioschema protein component. For the UKON submission, which is meant to introduce/present the whole bioschema efforts, i feel that having the lead of each group (http://bioschemas.org/groups/) acknowledged as author would be fairer on these people. If this is too long a list, then Justin's solution is straight to point and indeed shows that the work is done by a community, a group of like minded folks doing the leg work. I hope this clarifies my comment. Cheers Philippe On 01/03/2018 16:31, LJ Garcia Castro wrote: > > I have also seen one explicit author (the submitter) or a few (those > directly contributing to the writing and the actual poster) and then > the community. the idea behind an explicit author is to make it easier > for people looking at the paper to address the person right next to it. > > Regards, > > > On 01/03/2018 16:28, Justin Clark-Casey wrote: >> An approach I've seen on some other papers is just to put "The >> Bioschemas Community" as the single author with no named >> individuals. Perhaps this would also be suitable for a poster where >> a list of official authors has not yet been agreed. >> >> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:14 PM, LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk >> <mailto:ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>> wrote: >> >> Hi Pete, all, >> >> Thanks for the comments and contributions. >> >> Just for posters, just some few authors seem enough for me. >> However, I am happy to add more as needed so I will go with any >> list of authors agreed by the community. Could please Alasdair, >> Rafael or Carole point to the official list of authors that >> should be used for posters? Also, what would be page to use as a >> link to the community? >> >> I need to submit tonight as tomorrow I am flying. So, I would be >> grateful if you can provide that information as soon as possible. >> >> If no agreement about authors is reached on time, should I better >> stop the submission or submit as it is? >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> On 01/03/2018 14:52, Peter McQuilton wrote: >>> >>> Hi Leyla, >>> >>> I've added a few edits. I'm not sure about authorship though. >>> The abstract is pretty broad, so I wonder whether you shouldn't >>> include more authors from the other specifications as well. I >>> know this came up on Alasdair's abstract as well, and I have to >>> say I agree with Philippe's assertion that representatives from >>> the other specifications should also be included, along with >>> (somewhere), a link to the communities page listed all the >>> contributors. >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Pete >>> >>> >>> On 01/03/2018 10:49, LJ Garcia Castro wrote: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> This [1] is the abstract I will submit to UKON corresponding to >>>> Bioschemas specification. It is mainly based on the work >>>> carried last year during the BioHackathon and later adopted >>>> during the October Bioschemas meeting. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbYg7gk24s9kC33bELKulPMQL6OVtnBi8c1XPgQc6hs/edit# >>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbYg7gk24s9kC33bELKulPMQL6OVtnBi8c1XPgQc6hs/edit#> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Peter McQuilton, PhD >>> >>> Project Coordinator >>> >>> FAIRsharing.org <https://FAIRsharing.org> >>> >>> Oxford e-Research Centre >>> >>> University of Oxford >>> >>> OX1 3QG, UK >>> >>> >>> International Society of Biocuration <https://biocuration.org> >>> >>> Skype: petemcquilton >>> >>> Twitter: @drosophilic >>> >>> ORCID: 0000-0003-2687-1982 >>> >> >> >
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2018 16:46:40 UTC