W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bioschemas@w3.org > March 2018

Re: Abstract for UKON poster (about the specification)

From: Peter McQuilton <peter.mcquilton@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 17:26:29 +0000
To: "Gray, Alasdair J G" <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>, Philippe <proccaserra@gmail.com>
Cc: LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>, Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com>, "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>, Carole Goble <carole.goble@manchester.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <3185b260-a614-a50e-3e0d-8cf3ca726334@oerc.ox.ac.uk>
Hi Alasdair, all,

Your authorship solution sounds fair to me. I agree it's useful to have 
a named point of contact, but after that it gets a bit tricky.

Best,

Pete


On 01/03/2018 17:23, Gray, Alasdair J G wrote:
> Hi
>
>> On 1 Mar 2018, at 16:46, Philippe <proccaserra@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:proccaserra@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Justin, Leyla, Alasdair
>>
>> Either of those solutions are good, and there is no discussion that 
>> Leyla should be the author for a submission presenting the bioschema 
>> protein component.
>> For the UKON submission,   which is meant to introduce/present the 
>> whole bioschema efforts, i feel that having the lead of each group 
>> (http://bioschemas.org/groups/) acknowledged as author would be 
>> fairer on these people.
>> If this is too long a list, then Justin's solution is straight to 
>> point and indeed shows that the work is done by a community, a group 
>> of like minded folks doing the leg work.
>
> I think that Leyla’s point that it is useful for the event organisers 
> to have a point of contact and visible person at the event is important.
>
> For the UKON, there is no associated proceedings, so can we go with 
> the proposal of the person presenting and the Bioschemas Community?
>
> For the planned journal paper we will consult widely for the 
> authorship list, but the intention is to involve everyone who has 
> contributed to the community.
>
> We already had the issue of publications on the agenda for the next 
> management group meeting, but we will now extend this to cover 
> authorship issues as well.
>
> Alasdair
>>
>> I hope this clarifies my comment.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>> On 01/03/2018 16:31, LJ Garcia Castro wrote:
>>>
>>> I have also seen one explicit author (the submitter) or a few (those 
>>> directly contributing to the writing and the actual poster) and then 
>>> the community. the idea behind an explicit author is to make it 
>>> easier for people looking at the paper to address the person right 
>>> next to it.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/03/2018 16:28, Justin Clark-Casey wrote:
>>>> An approach I've seen on some other papers is just to put "The 
>>>> Bioschemas Community" as the single author with no named 
>>>> individuals.  Perhaps this would also be suitable for a poster 
>>>> where a list of official authors has not yet been agreed.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:14 PM, LJ Garcia Castro 
>>>> <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk <mailto:ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Hi Pete, all,
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks for the comments and contributions.
>>>>
>>>>     Just for posters, just some few authors seem enough for me.
>>>>     However, I am happy to add more as needed so I will go with any
>>>>     list of authors agreed by the community. Could please Alasdair,
>>>>     Rafael or Carole point to the official list of authors that
>>>>     should be used for posters? Also, what would be page to use as
>>>>     a link to the community?
>>>>
>>>>     I need to submit tonight as tomorrow I am flying. So, I would
>>>>     be grateful if you can provide that information as soon as
>>>>     possible.
>>>>
>>>>     If no agreement about authors is reached on time, should I
>>>>     better stop the submission or submit as it is?
>>>>
>>>>     Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On 01/03/2018 14:52, Peter McQuilton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Hi Leyla,
>>>>>
>>>>>     I've added a few edits. I'm not sure about authorship though.
>>>>>     The abstract is pretty broad, so I wonder whether you
>>>>>     shouldn't include more authors from the other specifications
>>>>>     as well. I know this came up on Alasdair's abstract as well,
>>>>>     and I have to say I agree with Philippe's assertion that
>>>>>     representatives from the other specifications should also be
>>>>>     included, along with (somewhere), a link to the communities
>>>>>     page listed all the contributors.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Best,
>>>>>
>>>>>     Pete
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On 01/03/2018 10:49, LJ Garcia Castro wrote:
>>>>>>     Dear all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     This [1] is the abstract I will submit to UKON corresponding
>>>>>>     to Bioschemas specification. It is mainly based on the work
>>>>>>     carried last year during the BioHackathon and later adopted
>>>>>>     during the October Bioschemas meeting.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     [1]
>>>>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbYg7gk24s9kC33bELKulPMQL6OVtnBi8c1XPgQc6hs/edit#
>>>>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbYg7gk24s9kC33bELKulPMQL6OVtnBi8c1XPgQc6hs/edit#>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     -- 
>>>>>
>>>>>     Peter McQuilton, PhD
>>>>>
>>>>>     Project Coordinator
>>>>>
>>>>>     FAIRsharing.org <https://fairsharing.org/>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Oxford e-Research Centre
>>>>>
>>>>>     University of Oxford
>>>>>
>>>>>     OX1 3QG, UK
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     International Society of Biocuration <https://biocuration.org/>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Skype: petemcquilton
>>>>>
>>>>>     Twitter: @drosophilic
>>>>>
>>>>>     ORCID: 0000-0003-2687-1982
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Alasdair J G Gray
>
> Fellow of the Higher Education Academy
> Assistant Professor in Computer Science,
> School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences
> (Athena SWAN Bronze Award)
> Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh UK.
>
> Email: A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk <mailto:A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
> Web: http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/~ajg33 <http://www.macs.hw.ac.uk/%7Eajg33>
> ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5711-4872
> Office: Earl Mountbatten Building 1.39
> Twitter: @gray_alasdair
>
> Untitled Document
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> */Heriot-Watt University is The Times & The Sunday Times International 
> University of the Year 2018/*
>
> Founded in 1821, Heriot-Watt is a leader in ideas and solutions. With 
> campuses and students across the entire globe we span the world, 
> delivering innovation and educational excellence in business, 
> engineering, design and the physical, social and life sciences.
>
> This email is generated from the Heriot-Watt University Group, which 
> includes:
>
>  1. Heriot-Watt University, a Scottish charity registered under number
>     SC000278
>  2. Edinburgh Business School a Charity Registered in Scotland,
>     SC026900. Edinburgh Business School is a company limited by
>     guarantee, registered in Scotland with registered number SC173556
>     and registered office at Heriot-Watt University Finance Office,
>     Riccarton, Currie, Midlothian, EH14 4AS
>  3. Heriot- Watt Services Limited (Oriam), Scotland's national
>     performance centre for sport. Heriot-Watt Services Limited is a
>     private limited company registered is Scotland with registered
>     number SC271030 and registered office at Research & Enterprise
>     Services Heriot-Watt University, Riccarton, Edinburgh, EH14 4AS.
>
> The contents (including any attachments) are confidential. If you are 
> not the intended recipient of this e-mail, any disclosure, copying, 
> distribution or use of its contents is strictly prohibited, and you 
> should please notify the sender immediately and then delete it 
> (including any attachments) from your system.
>

-- 

Peter McQuilton, PhD

Project Coordinator

FAIRsharing.org <https://FAIRsharing.org>

Oxford e-Research Centre

University of Oxford

OX1 3QG, UK


International Society of Biocuration <https://biocuration.org>

Skype: petemcquilton

Twitter: @drosophilic

ORCID: 0000-0003-2687-1982
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2018 17:27:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:03 UTC