W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-bioschemas@w3.org > March 2018

Re: Abstract for UKON poster (about the specification)

From: LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 16:31:31 +0000
To: Justin Clark-Casey <justinccdev@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter McQuilton <peter.mcquilton@oerc.ox.ac.uk>, "public-bioschemas@w3.org" <public-bioschemas@w3.org>, Carole Goble <carole.goble@manchester.ac.uk>, "Gray, Alasdair J G" <A.J.G.Gray@hw.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <08416004-53e9-b6b5-bebc-36aecc088d79@ebi.ac.uk>
I have also seen one explicit author (the submitter) or a few (those 
directly contributing to the writing and the actual poster) and then the 
community. the idea behind an explicit author is to make it easier for 
people looking at the paper to address the person right next to it.

Regards,


On 01/03/2018 16:28, Justin Clark-Casey wrote:
> An approach I've seen on some other papers is just to put "The 
> Bioschemas Community" as the single author with no named individuals.  
> Perhaps this would also be suitable for a poster where a list of 
> official authors has not yet been agreed.
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 4:14 PM, LJ Garcia Castro <ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk 
> <mailto:ljgarcia@ebi.ac.uk>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Pete, all,
>
>     Thanks for the comments and contributions.
>
>     Just for posters, just some few authors seem enough for me.
>     However, I am happy to add more as needed so I will go with any
>     list of authors agreed by the community. Could please Alasdair,
>     Rafael or Carole point to the official list of authors that should
>     be used for posters? Also, what would be page to use as a link to
>     the community?
>
>     I need to submit tonight as tomorrow I am flying. So, I would be
>     grateful if you can provide that information as soon as possible.
>
>     If no agreement about authors is reached on time, should I better
>     stop the submission or submit as it is?
>
>     Kind regards,
>
>
>     On 01/03/2018 14:52, Peter McQuilton wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Leyla,
>>
>>     I've added a few edits. I'm not sure about authorship though. The
>>     abstract is pretty broad, so I wonder whether you shouldn't
>>     include more authors from the other specifications as well. I
>>     know this came up on Alasdair's abstract as well, and I have to
>>     say I agree with Philippe's assertion that representatives from
>>     the other specifications should also be included, along with
>>     (somewhere), a link to the communities page listed all the
>>     contributors.
>>
>>     Best,
>>
>>     Pete
>>
>>
>>     On 01/03/2018 10:49, LJ Garcia Castro wrote:
>>>     Dear all,
>>>
>>>     This [1] is the abstract I will submit to UKON corresponding to
>>>     Bioschemas specification. It is mainly based on the work carried
>>>     last year during the BioHackathon and later adopted during the
>>>     October Bioschemas meeting.
>>>
>>>     Regards,
>>>
>>>     [1]
>>>     https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbYg7gk24s9kC33bELKulPMQL6OVtnBi8c1XPgQc6hs/edit#
>>>     <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LbYg7gk24s9kC33bELKulPMQL6OVtnBi8c1XPgQc6hs/edit#>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>
>>     Peter McQuilton, PhD
>>
>>     Project Coordinator
>>
>>     FAIRsharing.org <https://FAIRsharing.org>
>>
>>     Oxford e-Research Centre
>>
>>     University of Oxford
>>
>>     OX1 3QG, UK
>>
>>
>>     International Society of Biocuration <https://biocuration.org>
>>
>>     Skype: petemcquilton
>>
>>     Twitter: @drosophilic
>>
>>     ORCID: 0000-0003-2687-1982
>>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 1 March 2018 16:31:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:08:02 UTC