- From: Streif, Rudolf <rstreif@partner.jaguarlandrover.com>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:18:59 -0700
- To: T Guild <ted@w3.org>
- Cc: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANpGCG+MgKae3m0mcEWyvyNjkcN3z2Gz9K10GTT338gWfKgGLA@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you, Ted. I apologize that I was not able to join the call yesterday. Unfortunately, I have an increasing number of conflicts. Thank you all for moving things along. I hope that I can join again for the next meeting. :rjs On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 6:35 PM, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> wrote: > Since I was on the road for the first half of this call, instead of > minutes I am providing a summary. > > Attendees: > > Hira > Mike > Paul > Ted > Urata > Wonsuk > Hyojin > > Topics: > > Moving VIAS and VISS to CR > F2F agenda > RSI summary and call survey > > To move to CR we are encouraged to have issues list close to nil. > Issues may be open but we are encouraged to not have any open ones that > may result in substantive changes. At this point we are expected to > have a spec that is more stable, a Candidate Recommendation. We can > make minor, iterative changes during CR but any substantive ones need > to go to the Director for approval. We need to ask for review on > Accessibility, Internationalization, Privacy and Security. I can > initiate that and believe Accessibility and Internationalization are > less of a concern for VISS since it is a service. > > We want the issues list to be complete for our next teleconference in > two weeks so ideally the Chairs can initiate a Call for Consensus and > we can publish one or both. > > We were able to discuss the VIAS issues a bit more with Urata, Mike and > Hyojin on the line. > > Some of the work, eg implementation reports and test suite are needed > to exit, not enter, CR so we are on a good path there. Urata wants more > test contributions for VIAS. Mike is willing and the more writers the > better. > > We learned that Wonsuk has the start of an implementation for VISS and > he is passing 30% (if I heard correctly) of the test suite. I asked but > guess we were having audio problems what the implementation is for, > more proof of concept with Samsung and OCF or perhaps a collaboration > between ETRI and a Tier 1. Hopefully he can elaborate and if it is in a > public repo, drop us the link. > > Mike reported that IBM is looking at our Automotive work for handling > vehicles on IoT. > > Regarding the Face to Face meeting in early November. > > https://www.w3.org/2017/11/TPAC/ > > November 6th and 7th the WG will meet and discuss a charter extension > to complete current work since we have continued to slip on our > schedule and lost even the VIAS WD shortcut we gained earlier. We > clearly will also discuss the specs' status, next work items for > recharter including RSI and domains. > > The 8th is W3C's open day which some may wish to attend. There will be > a separate Executive Summit which will include an Automotive track that > Genivi will be working with us on to bring in OEM and tech companies in > the area. Some may wish to spend part of the day working on code > prototypes and specs with colleagues in the WG, taking advantage of > being in the same place. > > Thursday the 9th will be RSI and probably an hour or two on Web > Payments. > > Also on the WG call today I gave a summary, see separate email, on RSI > conversation we had last week and surveyed who will be around on the > Asia/Europe friendly call in several hours. > > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-autowebplatform/ > 2017Sep/0000.html > > -- > Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> > W3C Systems Team > http://www.w3.org -- *Rudolf J Streif* System Architect - Open Source Initiative Open Source Technology Centre *M:* +1.619.631.5383 *Email:* rstreif@partner.jaguarlandrover.com UK: G/26/2 G02 Building 523, Engineering Centre, Gaydon, Warwick, CV35 ORR US: 1419 NW 14th Ave, Portland, OR 97209 jaguar.com | landrover.com ------------------- Business Details: Jaguar Land Rover Limited Registered Office: Abbey Road, Whitley, Coventry CV3 4LF Registered in England No: 1672070 This e-mail and any attachments contain confidential information for a specific individual and purpose. The information is private and privileged and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please e-mail us immediately. We apologise for any inconvenience caused but you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the information contained herein is strictly prohibited. This e-mail does not constitute an order for goods or services unless accompanied by an official purchase order.
Received on Wednesday, 6 September 2017 16:19:28 UTC