- From: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
- Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 02:15:37 +0000
- To: "Gavigan, Kevin" <kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com>
- CC: "Crofts, Adam" <acrofts1@jaguarlandrover.com>, public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <927A86A7956B074D9C861431DA4BA5355DC587E4@SMTP4.etri.info>
Kevin. Thanks for summary for VISS issue we have. Only outstanding issue to go CR is #223 (wwwivi). To me, Hyojin’s proposal(using .local) could be an one of possible solution. But It seem need to have more broader feedback including OEM and related companies. I think we need to get a feedback from GENIVI side as well. Right? Anyone can follow up? Or Is it already on going? Kind regards, Wonsuk. From: Gavigan, Kevin [mailto:kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:21 PM To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr> Cc: Crofts, Adam <acrofts1@jaguarlandrover.com>; public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org> Subject: Re: Request to make the issue list for VISS Hi Wonsuk, Good to hear from you and great to hear that there is a consensus to bring VISS and VIAS to CR before the upcoming TPAC. Adam and I have been working thru the VISS issues when we could in background and as far as I know, they have been either been cleared and closed or we are almost ready to merge (e.g. #226) The only exception is #223 (wwwivi) - we would very much appreciate feedback from the group on how we should proceed. If we can resolve #223, we could potentially be in position to propose moving to CR within a few days... Kind regards, Kev Kevin Gavigan BSc, MSc, PhD, MCP, MCTS Software Architect Connected Infotainment Electrical, Electronic and Software Engineering (EESE) Jaguar Land Rover Mobile: 07990 084866 Email: kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com<mailto:kgavigan@jaguarlandrover.com> Office address: GO03/057 • Building 523, Gaydon • Maildrop: (G03) Jaguar Land Rover • Banbury Road • Gaydon • Warwick • CV35 0RR On 6 September 2017 at 01:49, 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr<mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>> wrote: Hi. Kevin and Adam, In the today’s call there was a consensus to bring VISS and VIAS to CR asap esp. before upcoming TPAC. Regarding VISS, there is only one open issue[1] in github. I think you guys (might be) have other issues we need to solve before CR. Am I right? If yes, could you share that list via email or issue page in github? [1] https://github.com/w3c/automotive/issues/223 Kind regards, Wonsuk.
Received on Thursday, 7 September 2017 02:16:12 UTC