Re: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec

Draft a message citing this thread as recorded consensus from chairs, editors, team contacts, etc and previously agreed upon schedule as justification for a short objection period our reason not to have one. I have not found in our process document an explicit duration requirement and trying to get clarification so we can publish asap. I'll reply as soon as I get that answer.

-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Systems Team
http://www.w3.org

> On Oct 18, 2016, at 10:52 AM, Streif, Rudolf <rstreif@jaguarlandrover.com> wrote:
> 
> I can do that. What is our agreed on deadline?
> 
> 
>> On Oct 18, 2016 10:39 AM, "Ted Guild" <ted@w3.org> wrote:
>> While there is clear consensus to publish in this thread, I have not
>> seen a formal Cfc mail sent to the list. Can one of the Chairs please
>> send following example Wonsuk cited?
>> 
>> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 06:17 +0000, 이원석 wrote:
>> > Great!
>> > If we have done this process in short term. I expect Ted and Kaz will
>> > take care of the rest of the work for official publication of the
>> > spec! J
>> >  
>> > Kind regards,
>> > Wonsuk.
>> >  
>> > From: Peter Winzell [mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com] 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 3:13 PM
>> > To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
>> > Cc: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
>> > Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
>> > spec
>> >  
>> > Hi Wonsuk!
>> > I think I understand. I will do a review now.
>> >  
>> > Br
>> > /pw
>> >  
>> > From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr] 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 7:58 AM
>> > To: Peter Winzell
>> > Cc: public-automotive
>> > Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
>> > spec
>> >  
>> > Hi. Peter.
>> > It doesn’t mean the consensus for the specific date. It means the
>> > consensus for official publication of vehicle signal server spec as a
>> > FPWD of W3C.
>> >  
>> > Below CfC example is from system applications WG. Typically duration
>> > of CfC is one week but we have rough consensus to go FPWD in the TPAC
>> > meeting so we might be make the term shorter. One thing you should
>> > know is W3C only publish the specs in the Tuesday or Thursday of the
>> > week. It means there is only two days to publish the FPWD of server
>> > spec in the next week.
>> >                               
>> > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2014Oct/0030.
>> > html
>> >  
>> > Kind regards,
>> > Wonsuk.
>> >  
>> > From: Peter Winzell [mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com] 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:37 PM
>> > To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>; public-automotive <public-automotive
>> > @w3.org>
>> > Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
>> > spec
>> >  
>> > Hi Wonsuk!
>> >  
>> > So, the consensus we are looking for is whether or not the Vehicle
>> > Service Spec is in a state for publication on Oct 11 ?
>> >  
>> > Br
>> > Peter Winzell
>> >  
>> > From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr] 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:58 AM
>> > To: public-automotive
>> > Subject: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec
>> >  
>> > Hi. All.
>> > In the last TPAC meeting we had a consensus to publish the FPWD for
>> > vehicle signal server spec at 11th October. Because we really want to
>> > do this before GENIVI AMM meeting in Burlingame. To achieving this,
>> > we need to have CfC(Call for Consensus) process for the spec as soon
>> > as possible.
>> >  
>> > Chairs! (Paul, Rudi and Peter)
>> > I guess it would be perfect if you do this with short term CfC today
>> > or tomorrow!
>> >  
>> > Thanks!
>> >  
>> > Kind regards,
>> > Wonsuk.
>> > =========================================
>> > 이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Senior Researcher, Ph.D
>> > 한국전자통신연구원 표준연구센터(Protocol Engineering Center, ETRI)
>> > Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997   Office: +82-42-860-6104
>> > E-mail: wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr
>> > http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
>> > =========================================
>> >  
>> --
>> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
>> W3C Systems Team
>> http://www.w3.org
>>