W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-automotive@w3.org > October 2016

Re: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec

From: Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 14:49:18 -0700
Message-Id: <6008836E-E5D3-41B4-929E-EEB2D9FDE8FA@w3.org>
Cc: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>, Peter Winzell <Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com>, 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
To: "Streif, Rudolf" <rstreif@jaguarlandrover.com>
Response was we can have a formal public statement that asserts we have reached consensus.

-- 
Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
W3C Systems Team
http://www.w3.org

> On Oct 18, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Ted Guild <ted@w3.org> wrote:
> 
> Draft a message citing this thread as recorded consensus from chairs, editors, team contacts, etc and previously agreed upon schedule as justification for a short objection period our reason not to have one. I have not found in our process document an explicit duration requirement and trying to get clarification so we can publish asap. I'll reply as soon as I get that answer.
> 
> -- 
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> W3C Systems Team
> http://www.w3.org
> 
>> On Oct 18, 2016, at 10:52 AM, Streif, Rudolf <rstreif@jaguarlandrover.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I can do that. What is our agreed on deadline?
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 18, 2016 10:39 AM, "Ted Guild" <ted@w3.org> wrote:
>>> While there is clear consensus to publish in this thread, I have not
>>> seen a formal Cfc mail sent to the list. Can one of the Chairs please
>>> send following example Wonsuk cited?
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 06:17 +0000, 이원석 wrote:
>>> > Great!
>>> > If we have done this process in short term. I expect Ted and Kaz will
>>> > take care of the rest of the work for official publication of the
>>> > spec! J
>>> >  
>>> > Kind regards,
>>> > Wonsuk.
>>> >  
>>> > From: Peter Winzell [mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com] 
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 3:13 PM
>>> > To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
>>> > Cc: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
>>> > Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
>>> > spec
>>> >  
>>> > Hi Wonsuk!
>>> > I think I understand. I will do a review now.
>>> >  
>>> > Br
>>> > /pw
>>> >  
>>> > From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr] 
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 7:58 AM
>>> > To: Peter Winzell
>>> > Cc: public-automotive
>>> > Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
>>> > spec
>>> >  
>>> > Hi. Peter.
>>> > It doesn’t mean the consensus for the specific date. It means the
>>> > consensus for official publication of vehicle signal server spec as a
>>> > FPWD of W3C.
>>> >  
>>> > Below CfC example is from system applications WG. Typically duration
>>> > of CfC is one week but we have rough consensus to go FPWD in the TPAC
>>> > meeting so we might be make the term shorter. One thing you should
>>> > know is W3C only publish the specs in the Tuesday or Thursday of the
>>> > week. It means there is only two days to publish the FPWD of server
>>> > spec in the next week.
>>> >                               
>>> > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2014Oct/0030.
>>> > html
>>> >  
>>> > Kind regards,
>>> > Wonsuk.
>>> >  
>>> > From: Peter Winzell [mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com] 
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:37 PM
>>> > To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>; public-automotive <public-automotive
>>> > @w3.org>
>>> > Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
>>> > spec
>>> >  
>>> > Hi Wonsuk!
>>> >  
>>> > So, the consensus we are looking for is whether or not the Vehicle
>>> > Service Spec is in a state for publication on Oct 11 ?
>>> >  
>>> > Br
>>> > Peter Winzell
>>> >  
>>> > From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr] 
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:58 AM
>>> > To: public-automotive
>>> > Subject: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec
>>> >  
>>> > Hi. All.
>>> > In the last TPAC meeting we had a consensus to publish the FPWD for
>>> > vehicle signal server spec at 11th October. Because we really want to
>>> > do this before GENIVI AMM meeting in Burlingame. To achieving this,
>>> > we need to have CfC(Call for Consensus) process for the spec as soon
>>> > as possible.
>>> >  
>>> > Chairs! (Paul, Rudi and Peter)
>>> > I guess it would be perfect if you do this with short term CfC today
>>> > or tomorrow!
>>> >  
>>> > Thanks!
>>> >  
>>> > Kind regards,
>>> > Wonsuk.
>>> > =========================================
>>> > 이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Senior Researcher, Ph.D
>>> > 한국전자통신연구원 표준연구센터(Protocol Engineering Center, ETRI)
>>> > Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997   Office: +82-42-860-6104
>>> > E-mail: wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr
>>> > http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
>>> > =========================================
>>> >  
>>> --
>>> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
>>> W3C Systems Team
>>> http://www.w3.org
>>> 
Received on Tuesday, 18 October 2016 21:53:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 October 2017 18:52:52 UTC