Re: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec

I can do that. What is our agreed on deadline?

On Oct 18, 2016 10:39 AM, "Ted Guild" <ted@w3.org> wrote:

> While there is clear consensus to publish in this thread, I have not
> seen a formal Cfc mail sent to the list. Can one of the Chairs please
> send following example Wonsuk cited?
>
> On Wed, 2016-10-05 at 06:17 +0000, 이원석 wrote:
> > Great!
> > If we have done this process in short term. I expect Ted and Kaz will
> > take care of the rest of the work for official publication of the
> > spec! J
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Wonsuk.
> >
> > From: Peter Winzell [mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 3:13 PM
> > To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>
> > Cc: public-automotive <public-automotive@w3.org>
> > Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
> > spec
> >
> > Hi Wonsuk!
> > I think I understand. I will do a review now.
> >
> > Br
> > /pw
> >
> > From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 7:58 AM
> > To: Peter Winzell
> > Cc: public-automotive
> > Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
> > spec
> >
> > Hi. Peter.
> > It doesn’t mean the consensus for the specific date. It means the
> > consensus for official publication of vehicle signal server spec as a
> > FPWD of W3C.
> >
> > Below CfC example is from system applications WG. Typically duration
> > of CfC is one week but we have rough consensus to go FPWD in the TPAC
> > meeting so we might be make the term shorter. One thing you should
> > know is W3C only publish the specs in the Tuesday or Thursday of the
> > week. It means there is only two days to publish the FPWD of server
> > spec in the next week.
> >
> > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sysapps/2014Oct/0030.
> > html
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Wonsuk.
> >
> > From: Peter Winzell [mailto:Peter.Winzell@melcogot.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 2:37 PM
> > To: 이원석 <wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr>; public-automotive <public-automotive
> > @w3.org>
> > Subject: RE: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server
> > spec
> >
> > Hi Wonsuk!
> >
> > So, the consensus we are looking for is whether or not the Vehicle
> > Service Spec is in a state for publication on Oct 11 ?
> >
> > Br
> > Peter Winzell
> >
> > From: 이원석 [mailto:wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 5, 2016 3:58 AM
> > To: public-automotive
> > Subject: Cheching the schedule of FPWD for vehicle signal server spec
> >
> > Hi. All.
> > In the last TPAC meeting we had a consensus to publish the FPWD for
> > vehicle signal server spec at 11th October. Because we really want to
> > do this before GENIVI AMM meeting in Burlingame. To achieving this,
> > we need to have CfC(Call for Consensus) process for the spec as soon
> > as possible.
> >
> > Chairs! (Paul, Rudi and Peter)
> > I guess it would be perfect if you do this with short term CfC today
> > or tomorrow!
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Wonsuk.
> > =========================================
> > 이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Senior Researcher, Ph.D
> > 한국전자통신연구원 표준연구센터(Protocol Engineering Center, ETRI)
> > Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997   Office: +82-42-860-6104
> > E-mail: wonsuk.lee@etri.re.kr
> > http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
> > =========================================
> >
> --
> Ted Guild <ted@w3.org>
> W3C Systems Team
> http://www.w3.org
>
>