W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-automotive@w3.org > August 2015

Re: [IG-SP] Review of Security&Privacy Requirements Catalogue

From: Qing An <anqing.aq@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 17:03:12 +0800
To: "'Kazuyuki Ashimura'" <ashimura@w3.org>, "'Paul Boyes'" <pb@opencar.com>
Cc: "'public-automotive'" <public-automotive@w3.org>, <public-auto-privacy-security@w3.org>
Message-ID: <011f01d0df14$df5fc580$9e1f5080$@alibaba-inc.com>
 

Sounds great!

 

Qing An

Alibaba Group

 

 

 

From: Kazuyuki Ashimura [mailto:ashimura@w3.org] 
Send Time: 2015年8月20日 13:01
To: Paul Boyes
Cc: public-automotive; public-auto-privacy-security@w3.org
Subject: Re: [IG-SP] Review of Security&Privacy Requirements Catalogue

 

Also I'm suggesting a joint session on location-based services

with the Automotive WG/BG to the Geolocation WG :)

 

Please see:

  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2015Aug/0009.html

 

Kazuyuki

 

 

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org <mailto:ashimura@w3.org> > wrote:

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:18 AM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com <mailto:pb@opencar.com> > wrote:

Sounds good Kaz.  This could be part of the WG agenda for Monday or Tuesday at TPAC.  Would that make sense?

 

Sure :)

 

Kazuyuki

 

 

 


Paul J. Boyes

--------------------------------

Mobile:   206-276-9675 <tel:206-276-9675>     
Skype:  pauljboyes    

 

 

 

On Aug 19, 2015, at 10:15 AM, Kazuyuki Ashimura <ashimura@w3.org <mailto:ashimura@w3.org> > wrote:

 

Thanks for forwarding this to the public-automotive list, Paul! 

 

During the WoT IG meeting in Sunnyvale, I mentioned our

security&privacy discussion within the Automotive BG/WG

and suggested the WoT IG should work with the Automotive

group.

 

And Oliver, the moderator of the WoT IG's security&privacy

TF, said:

- They are interested in the possible collaboration.

- However, they would concentrate on their own formalization first.

- TPAC 2015 in Sapporo would be a good opportunity to start actual

  collaboration.

 

Kazuyuki

 

 

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:18 AM, Paul Boyes <pb@opencar.com <mailto:pb@opencar.com> > wrote:

>From the WOT group.  Is of interest.


Paul J. Boyes

--------------------------------

Mobile:   206-276-9675 <tel:206-276-9675>     
Skype:  pauljboyes    

 

 

 

Begin forwarded message:





Resent-From: <public-wot-ig@w3.org <mailto:public-wot-ig@w3.org> >

From: "Nilsson, Claes1" <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com <mailto:Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com> >

Subject: RE: [IG-SP] Review of Security&Privacy Requirements Catalogue

Date: August 10, 2015 at 7:49:18 AM PDT

To: "'Pfaff, Oliver'" <oliver.pfaff@siemens.com <mailto:oliver.pfaff@siemens.com> >, "public-wot-ig@w3.org <mailto:public-wot-ig@w3.org> " <public-wot-ig@w3.org <mailto:public-wot-ig@w3.org> >

 

Hi Oliver and others,

 

Thanks for compiling this catalogue. I have some initial comments:

 

1.      Maybe each requirements should have a number or any other id. That would make it easier in discussions and follow-up of requirements.

2.      The list does more look like a the Security&Privacy Glossary in more detail than a list of requirements. That might be ok depending what we want to achieve. Do we want this or do we want?

a.       A total and tangible list of the security&privacy features applicable for WoT that needs to be covered by W3C standards (existing and new), using MUST, SHOULD and MAY vocabulary?

b.      A tangible list of the security&privacy features applicable for WoT that needs to be standardized by W3C in addition to what exists today (or what is in progress being standardized), i.e. a gap list, using MUST, SHOULD and MAY vocabulary?

WDYT?

 

BR

  Claes

 

 

 

Claes Nilsson

Master Engineer - Web Research

Research&Incubation

 

Sony Mobile Communications

Tel: +46 70 55 66 878

 <mailto:Firstname.Lastname@sonymobile.com> claes1.nilsson@sonymobile.com

 

 <http://sonymobile.com/> sonymobile.com

 

<image003.png>

 

From: Pfaff, Oliver [ <mailto:oliver.pfaff@siemens.com> mailto:oliver.pfaff@siemens.com] 
Sent: den 5 augusti 2015 13:48
To:  <mailto:public-wot-ig@w3.org> public-wot-ig@w3.org
Subject: [IG-SP] Review of Security&Privacy Requirements Catalogue

 

Dear colleagues,

until now the  <https://www.w3.org/WoT/IG/wiki/Security%26Privacy_Requirements_Catalogue> Security&Privacy Requirements Catalogue used to be a bit of a laundry list. That changed and now there is a first draft version for review.

 

Formally the Wiki page is public (as well as this mail) and we’d accept comments from anybody in WoT IG. However I would like to ask for review and feedback from [IG-SP] before sending heads-up notices to the TFs.

 

When reviewing, please check for:

*        Completeness: does the catalogue cover all requirements that we want to highlight (caveat: it should not become too lengthy, special interest items may have to be dropped to avoid the ‘TL;NR’ syndrome)?

*        Correctness: are the contents of the catalogue sufficiently sound (caveat: it should not become academic, becoming too nitty-gritty should be avoided)?

*        Comprehension: do the contents compile when reading through the catalogue with common sense, are the contents intuitively accessible?

*        Wording: which improvements are needed to pass the ‘native speaker check’?

 

I suggest a review/feedback period (within SP) until Aug, 12. Please provide suggestion and addition/change requests on the public mailing list or in a personal exchange (suggestions and addition/change requests that arrive thereafter will also be accommodated – this is not meant as a final call)

 

Please note that I will do a round of double-checking against the IIC reference architecture during this review/feedback period (=> there might be some [hopefully minor] updates)

 

Please also note that there will be some derivative work that will reflect the structure of the security&privacy requirements catalogue => adding (new) catalogue items later on will be easy, tweaking the structure will be tedious. So let’s put a priority on establishing a structure that has a good chance of staying stable

 

Kind regards,

Oliver

 





 

-- 

Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Auto, TV, MMI, Voice and Geo

Tel: +81 3 3516 2504 <tel:%2B81%203%203516%202504> 

 

 





 

-- 

Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Auto, TV, MMI, Voice and Geo

Tel: +81 3 3516 2504 <tel:%2B81%203%203516%202504> 

 





 

-- 

Kaz Ashimura, W3C Staff Contact for Auto, TV, MMI, Voice and Geo

Tel: +81 3 3516 2504

 
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 09:03:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 24 October 2017 18:52:42 UTC