On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Chris Wilson <cwilso@google.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Jussi Kalliokoski < > jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> wrote: > >> While I do acknowledge that it is tedious to have to connect analyzer >> nodes to the DestinationNode (IIRC I was one of the people pushing for >> AnalyzerNode to not have this requirement), I don't think alleviating that >> pain point (that can be solved by, well, connecting to the DestinationNode) >> is worth the cost. >> > > Um. AnalyserNodes DON'T have to be connected to the destination - cf "*Note > that this output may be left unconnected."* in > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/audio/raw-file/tip/webaudio/specification.html#AnalyserNode-section. > > That's what I'm saying I pushed for and we got: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012AprJun/0010.html Cheers, Jussi > >
Received on Saturday, 14 September 2013 04:39:08 UTC