On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 2:18 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Jussi Kalliokoski < > jussi.kalliokoski@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On the other end there's the tediousness of a ScriptProcessorNode your >> module got from another module and you don't know how to make sure it gets >> garbage collected. I see that as a much bigger pain point. >> > > You could disconnect the inputs and outputs and remove the event listener > and then you're in good shape. > As a module without graph introspection, you most likely don't have another module's inputs or outputs, depending on whether you want to connect to or from the node, and even less likely do you have a reference to the event listener. Even the node itself doesn't necessarily know how to disconnect its inputs. It's doable if modules share all this information, but again, bigger pain point. J > But I think it would be better to add per AudioNode pause() and resume() > APIs. Then all you have to do is pause() it and drop JS references and > you're done. > > Rob > -- > Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni > le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa > stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, > 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp > waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * > * >
Received on Saturday, 14 September 2013 04:30:10 UTC