- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 03:23:40 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22723 --- Comment #4 from Srikumar Subramanian (Kumar) <srikumarks@gmail.com> --- I agree with Ehsan here. The only reason it is convenient to have a buffer size specifiable for a script processor node is to avoid audio glitching, since (as Ehsan pointed out) we can always code up any delays we require for an implementation in the onaudioprocess call. This need does not exist during offlien processing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 03:23:41 UTC