- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 03:22:34 +0000
- To: public-audio@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22723
Srikumar Subramanian (Kumar) <srikumarks@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |srikumarks@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Srikumar Subramanian (Kumar) <srikumarks@gmail.com> ---
I agree with Ehsan here. The only reason it is convenient to have a buffer size
specifiable for a script processor node is to avoid audio glitching, since (as
Ehsan pointed out) we can always code up any delays we req
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 03:22:35 UTC