Re: Consensus on the issue of deprecated APIs and sync decoding

On 25/06/2013 15:29, "Ehsan Akhgari" <> wrote:

>Do you mean the issue of whether we should keep the mention of the old
>names in the spec?  It's ok to keep discussing that, but the main things
>I'm seeking for consensus on is whether those names are removed from the
>normative text of the spec, and I don't believe there is a
>counter-proposal to that part of the issue.

Yes, fair enough.

I think it could be best for us to agree on where the text should end up
(if anywhere) before taking it out of the normative section of the spec,
but I agree that bit now appears uncontroversial - or indeed, I haven't
seen any objection.



This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and
may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated.
If you have received it in
error, please delete it from your system.
Do not use, copy or disclose the
information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender
Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails
sent or received.
Further communication will signify your consent to

Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 14:38:12 UTC