On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Olivier Thereaux < Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > On 25/06/2013 15:29, "Ehsan Akhgari" <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Do you mean the issue of whether we should keep the mention of the old > >names in the spec? It's ok to keep discussing that, but the main things > >I'm seeking for consensus on is whether those names are removed from the > >normative text of the spec, and I don't believe there is a > >counter-proposal to that part of the issue. > > Yes, fair enough. > > I think it could be best for us to agree on where the text should end up > (if anywhere) before taking it out of the normative section of the spec, > but I agree that bit now appears uncontroversial - or indeed, I haven't > seen any objection. It would be interesting to see if we can add something to < https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web_Audio_API/Porting_webkitAudioContext_code_to_standards_based_AudioContext> which makes that article a more complete resource for web developers who wish to learn how to port their code over to the standard AudioContext... I think that most of the content in the "old names" section of the spec is currently reflected in that document. Cheers, -- Ehsan <http://ehsanakhgari.org/>
Received on Tuesday, 25 June 2013 19:31:26 UTC