Isn't that already true in the presence of sources like <audio> or <video>, or WebRTC streams, where pausing can occur? Furthermore, isn't this true for AudioBufferSourceNode once playbackRate is applied? If 'all nodes operate on the same timescale' is an intended design rule, I think that's reasonable - maybe even a very valuable rule. But it doesn't seem to be one right now from my layman's reading of the spec. -kg On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Kevin Gadd <kevin.gadd@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Could one simply define a ResamplerNode/PlaybackRateAdjustmentNode? Then, >> in cases where you want to stitch together smaller buffers and adjust the >> playback rate of all of them, you give them all the resampler node as a >> shared destination. >> > > Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that mean different nodes operate on > different timescales? It would be better to avoid that if we can. > > Rob > -- > Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le > atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa > stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm > aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt > wyeonut thoo mken.o w >
Received on Monday, 17 June 2013 22:34:31 UTC