- From: Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhgari@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 23:43:51 -0400
- To: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Cc: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>, "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CANTur_7N6AU=91ZtdtJiAmy2ipdzK3REHr4-sP76=727sTk-=Q@mail.gmail.com>
>From the perspective of Gecko as an implementer, I was really concerned about these obsolete names in the spec, as have already started to hear complaints about not supporting them in Firefox. Note that these are all style changes, and my position regarding backwards incompatible changes regarding things that actually mean a change in the functionality supported would be different. But, given the fact that WebKit which was the only other engine that was supporting Web Audio is unwilling to make backwards incomoatble changes with regards to these names (and I think Blinks adopts the same position), I don't believe that we are ever going to win this fight with evangelizing to websites using the new names because the majority of the Web Audio content is only ever tested against WebKit/Blink, and most web developers learning about Web Audio will be reading outdated material that was written around the time of the initial Web Audio launch, which are all using the old names. Therefore, we agreed that the best way forward in order to get interoperable implementations is to require support for the obsolete names under the title of alternate names. Cheers, -- Ehsan <http://ehsanakhgari.org/> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Olivier Thereaux < Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > On 17/04/2013 07:51, "Marcus Geelnard" <mage@opera.com> wrote: > > >I'm sorry that I missed the f2f discussion on this, so could someone > >please explain why the current approach of supporting both the old and > >the new names/ways was selected? > > The minutes are here, FWIW: > http://www.w3.org/2013/03/27-audio-minutes.html#item05 > > > Summary here: > http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/F2F_Mar_2013#vendor_prefixes_.26_.22depre > cated.22_interface > > -- > Olivier > > > > ----------------------------- > http://www.bbc.co.uk > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and > may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless > specifically stated. > If you have received it in > error, please delete it from your system. > Do not use, copy or disclose the > information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender > immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails > sent or received. > Further communication will signify your consent to > this. > ----------------------------- >
Received on Tuesday, 23 April 2013 03:44:58 UTC