- From: Olivier Thereaux <Olivier.Thereaux@bbc.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:35:29 +0000
- To: Marcus Geelnard <mage@opera.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Chris Rogers <crogers@google.com>
- CC: "public-audio@w3.org" <public-audio@w3.org>
On 17/04/2013 07:51, "Marcus Geelnard" <mage@opera.com> wrote: >I'm sorry that I missed the f2f discussion on this, so could someone >please explain why the current approach of supporting both the old and >the new names/ways was selected? The minutes are here, FWIW: http://www.w3.org/2013/03/27-audio-minutes.html#item05 Summary here: http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/F2F_Mar_2013#vendor_prefixes_.26_.22depre cated.22_interface -- Olivier ----------------------------- http://www.bbc.co.uk This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. -----------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 17 April 2013 19:36:15 UTC