- From: Dominic Mazzoni <dmazzoni@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 15:48:44 +0000
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>
- Cc: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>, Alexander Surkov <surkov.alexander@gmail.com>, Alice Boxhall <aboxhall@google.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, Bogdan Brinza <bbrinza@microsoft.com>
- Message-ID: <CAFz-FYwd2FXqY0oS-BO5Vt74aXTx4haLvQSYxj9V9ByMG_+wFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Is there a component for potential ARIA 1.2 issues? Even though 1.1 is nearly locked down I think from time to time we'll keep coming up with small issues like this, but it seems fine to set it aside for a while as we have a place to keep track of it. - Dominic On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 7:59 AM Richard Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for raising this issue. We are trying to lock down ARIA 1.1 for > June as HTML 5.1 and SVG2 are all trying to lock down. This is also an > objective of our group. We lost a minimum of 3 months in addressing charter > issues. > > If we are going to address this issue and it is really necessary we should > consider a very small ARIA 1.2. I checked with Freedom Scientific today and > they do not, for any browser or native Windows application announce step > information. Additionally, MSAA/IA2 used by both Firefox and Chrome does > not have a step value in its value interface. We would need to either > create a modification to the value interface or we would need to stick it > in an object attribute. Then we would need to convince at least one AT that > it is important to provide the information. > > I am not saying this does not have value. However, introducing a new issue > now would cause all of this work to get out of synch. We are trying to lock > down: > > SVG2 Accessibility > HTML 5.1 Accessibility > ARIA 1.1 > ARIA DPUB > ARIA Graphics > > and all the associated mapping specifications. We are also looking at > creating automated testing. Our plate is full. > > I recommend we make this an ARIA 2.0 issue and then decide if we should > make an ARIA 1.2 (a very limited release) and then discuss whether we bring > this in. Getting this all resolved from APIs to ATs to the spec. will take > some time. > > What is extremely important is that we lock down ARIA 1.1 and get working > on Web Components as well as a JavaScript accessibility API which many > browser vendors want. The charter delay set us back 3 months in getting on > that. I would like to really be able to focus on Web Components at TPAC. > > Rich > > > > > > On May 16, 2016, at 10:37 PM, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com> wrote: > > > > ARIA group, > > > > A long-standing problem with ARIA sliders is that they can only be made > partially accessible, and only on keyboard-based interfaces. There have > been some recent brainstorms and discussions about what it would require to > make custom ARIA sliders directly operable by AT (for example, on touch > screen devices). > > > > One of the missing links is an a direct equivalent to the @step > attribute on <input type="range">. > > > > Please consider adding @aria-valuestep (or an equivalent attr) for range > widgets such as sliders. Ideally this would be an addition to ARIA 1.1 to > match HTML and allow for future AT support. > > > > Thanks, > > James Craig > > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2016 15:49:22 UTC