Re: Confusion with spec name for "Accessible Name Computation" from Steve Faulkner on 2016-05-13 (public-aria@w3.org from May 2016)

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 07:10:03 +0100
To: James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com>
Cc: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>, James Craig <jcraig@apple.com>, ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA+ri+VktjRC1h_xvTDfvt=vMHnrz7JRf49YgGT8ZfCpFgQmWCg@mail.gmail.com>

On 13 May 2016 at 03:09, James Nurthen <james.nurthen@oracle.com> wrote:

> All of these proposals have more disadvantages to me than the current
> name. Unless someone can come up with a compelling reason to change to
> something which doesn't have these issues I would prefer to keep the
> current name.


I agree with James N here.


--

Regards

SteveF
Current Standards Work @W3C
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/blog/2015/03/current-standards-work-at-w3c/>

Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 06:11:10 UTC