Re: Confusion with spec name for "Accessible Name Computation"

On 13 May 2016 at 03:09, James Nurthen <> wrote:

> All of these proposals have more disadvantages to me than the current
> name. Unless someone can come up with a compelling reason to change to
> something which doesn't have these issues I would prefer to keep the
> current name.

I agree with James N here.



Current Standards Work @W3C

Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 06:11:10 UTC