W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-aria@w3.org > May 2016

Re: Password role proposal: Freedom Scientific response

From: Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 May 2016 16:30:15 -0500
Cc: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, John Foliot <john.foliot@deque.com>, "White, Jason J" <jjwhite@ets.org>, Birkir Gunnarsson <birkir.gunnarsson@deque.com>, public-aria@w3.org
Message-Id: <7A13568D-D41A-4D00-8AD5-1B7D7E943FC7@gmail.com>
To: tink@tink.uk
The group believes that is a slippery slope. HTML would not require SHOULDs to be implemented for exiting CR and the group will not require it be a MUST. 

That said, I will make a strong effort to get the 2 implementations you requested. We are months away from CR exit. We should be able to do it.


Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 26, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Léonie Watson <tink@tink.uk> wrote:

>> From: 'Janina Sajka' [mailto:janina@rednote.net]
>> Sent: 26 April 2016 17:04
>> And, have you ever Seen Apple, or Microsoft, or Freedom pre-announce
>> features? They're closed code shops, and they're not going to tell you
>> -- never have -- what they're going to do tomorrow or later on this
>> afternoon.
>> There's a correct horse and cart order here, let's not forget.
> There is. We should require appropriate interoperability before ARIA 1.1
> exits CR. It may be something new, but we should include screen readers
> within the interop requirement - not because we're trying to protect against
> misinterpretation, but because an AT is a non-negotiable part of the
> technology stack required to make ARIA viable.
> Léonie.
> -- 
> @LeonieWatson tink.uk Carpe diem
Received on Monday, 2 May 2016 21:30:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:58:26 UTC