Ok that will work. Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger > On Mar 15, 2016, at 9:11 AM, Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > On 2016-03-15 9:43 AM, Rich Schwerdtfeger wrote: >> Last week I had asked for an agenda item regarding applying ARIA states and properties wit elements having role=“none”. This was from the SVG a11y task force. > > I thought that was captured by the first agenda item: >> agenda+ ACTION-1681 (Joseph, Amelia) Editorial change(s) clarifying inclusions and/or exclusion rules. >> - Amelia's thoughts: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Mar/0093.html >> - Joseph's reply: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Mar/0127.html > > That is, one of the criteria for including an element in the accessibility tree is because it has ARIA states and properties in spite of role="none". If your request is different, I can add another agendum. What should it be? > > -- > ;;;;joseph. > > 'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draußen. Wieder.' > - C. Carter - >Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 15:51:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:58:22 UTC