- From: Joseph Scheuhammer <clown@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 10:11:23 -0400
- To: Rich Schwerdtfeger <richschwer@gmail.com>
- Cc: Accessible Rich Internet Applications Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>, "wai-xtech@w3.org" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
On 2016-03-15 9:43 AM, Rich Schwerdtfeger wrote:
> Last week I had asked for an agenda item regarding applying ARIA
> states and properties wit elements having role=“none”. This was from
> the SVG a11y task force.
I thought that was captured by the first agenda item:
> agenda+ ACTION-1681 (Joseph, Amelia) Editorial change(s) clarifying
> inclusions and/or exclusion rules.
> - Amelia's thoughts:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Mar/0093.html
> - Joseph's reply:
> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-aria/2016Mar/0127.html
That is, one of the criteria for including an element in the
accessibility tree is because it has ARIA states and properties in spite
of role="none". If your request is different, I can add another
agendum. What should it be?
--
;;;;joseph.
'Die Wahrheit ist Irgendwo da Draußen. Wieder.'
- C. Carter -
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 14:11:58 UTC