- From: Joanmarie Diggs <jdiggs@igalia.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 21:59:45 -0400
- To: Bryan Garaventa <bryan.garaventa@ssbbartgroup.com>
- Cc: ARIA Working Group <public-aria@w3.org>
Sorry for the noise. Below I wrote "aria-valuetext" that is a typo. "aria-valuemax" is the third required property of spinbutton. Please pretend I typed it right the first time in my response. :) On 06/22/2016 09:52 PM, Joanmarie Diggs wrote: > Hey Bryan. > > Regarding this: > > On 06/22/2016 07:47 PM, Bryan Garaventa wrote: > >> The spinbutton role was removed from this proposal because there is a >> desire to make it composite. Currently the spec is not written to >> support this and changes would be needed to do this, because it's not >> clear where and what attributes are needed and how focus should be >> handled, but this should be broken out into another action item. > > Taking the value-related properties as an example, and the assumption > that the children of the spinbutton would be an input and two buttons: > aria-valuemin, aria-valuenow, and aria-valuetext are supported on the > following roles: > > * range > * scrollbar > * slider > * spinbutton > > And through inheritance: > > * progressbar > > These properties are not supported on: > > * input > * button > > From this, my conclusion is that the answer to where the value-related > properties go is on the spinbutton itself. Conformance testers should > already be able to verify this now. I think this is clear. If you do not > think so, what is missing? A sentence that states this explicitly? > Something else? > > I'm happy to address (at least) making it more clear where and what > attributes are needed. I've not done this because I didn't realize it > was needed. So if you could tell me which properties are unclear, and > what approximately you think would help clarify them, I'm happy to do so > and can even try to have it done in my branch prior to tomorrow's meeting. > > Thanks! > --joanie >
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2016 02:00:23 UTC