- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:11:27 -0600
- To: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com>
- Cc: Fred Esch <fesch@us.ibm.com>, "public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OFEEA6757E.DA196669-ON86257F30.0079DF1F-86257F30.0079E618@us.ibm.com>
We don't have tabindex support in all the browsers for SVG. I would start with Chrome. Rich Schwerdtfeger From: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Cc: Fred Esch/Arlington/IBM@IBMUS, "public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org> Date: 12/15/2015 04:40 AM Subject: RE: ARIA roles in WAI-ARIA Graphics Module working draft Hi Rich, >>> <g tabindex="0" role="button"> Great! Question is if major browser and AT vendors will support that already by accident or intentionally ... I’ll do some testing J >>> In the future we will also have roles like: axis, datapoint, etc. I find that very useful since everybody seems to do chart libs in SVG these days. Is there already info available which additional roles are projected (a “chart” roles subchapter in the Graphics Module working draft perhaps)? We can give extensive feedback here what would be needed. Best Regards Stefan From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] Sent: Montag, 14. Dezember 2015 19:51 To: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> Cc: Fred Esch <fesch@us.ibm.com>; public-aria@w3.org Subject: RE: ARIA roles in WAI-ARIA Graphics Module working draft Hi Stefan, SVG is purely 2D Vector graphics as a host language. Regarding Flash I think you are referring to Flex for which you would have common interactive components. Adobe Flex is built on top of Flash. In your example you should probably have: <g tabindex="0" role="button"> yes, you could do the aria-description route but it would not be recommended as that is not the normal mapping for a button. I would not do that for HTML either. In the future we will also have roles like: axis, datapoint, etc. Best, Rich Rich Schwerdtfeger Inactive hide details for "Schnabel, Stefan" ---12/14/2015 07:39:04 AM---Hi Rich, Many thanks for the quick answer."Schnabel, Stefan" ---12/14/2015 07:39:04 AM---Hi Rich, Many thanks for the quick answer. From: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS Cc: Fred Esch/Arlington/IBM@IBMUS, "public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org > Date: 12/14/2015 07:39 AM Subject: RE: ARIA roles in WAI-ARIA Graphics Module working draft Hi Rich, Many thanks for the quick answer. >> In SVG 2.0 it is possible to do this as we have added keyboard support. Shouldn’t SVG2 better undergo a host language approach (such as declaring a <button> element) since this also defines roles where they belong, as elements the host language? I know already well http://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/ The reason I asked is because I feel when people see SVG more and more as flash substitute, the same widget accessibility topics will arise, notably definition of keyboard interaction and usage of roles not mentioned explicitly in the spec. I understand your attempt to keep the role set small in first instance. I also see the ARIA 1.1 aria-roledescription jumping right in here but for cases like aria-roledescription = ”button” this seems to be trivial and code variations like A) <g focusable role=”graphics-object” aria-roledescription = ”button” …> versus B) <g focusable role=”button” … > need spec clarification what to do in my opinion. Reading https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/struct.html#WAIARIAAttributes Role attribute, it seems that also C) <g focusable role=”graphics-object button” would be also OK. So, what is correct for a button-like element in SVG2, A) B) or C)? >> We have also added script-based keyboard support for SVG2. This is fine but will this also include standard keyboard behavior definitions as the APG for ARIA does? Or will there be reference implementation patterns if people start to design more complex components and widget-like things? Best Regards Stefan From: Richard Schwerdtfeger [mailto:schwer@us.ibm.com] Sent: Montag, 14. Dezember 2015 13:11 To: Schnabel, Stefan <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> Cc: Fred Esch <fesch@us.ibm.com>; public-aria@w3.org Subject: Re: ARIA roles in WAI-ARIA Graphics Module working draft Hi Stefan, In SVG 2.0 it is possible to do this as we have added keyboard support. We have a new graphics document that will be the basis for accessible graphics. The number of roles is intentionally small as we must first focus on making sure SVG base accessibility mapping is consistent across the operating system platforms. Right now it is all over the map and not all of SVG is provided for. Here is the ARIA graphics document. http://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/ I can tell you that SVG is IBM's replacement for Flash too. I would like to draw you and your developers to the current SVG2 specification section on WAI-ARIA. I am the editor on this: https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/struct.html#WAIARIAAttributes You will see we have added the tabindex attribute to SVG2: https://svgwg.org/svg2-draft/struct.html#tabindexattribute We have also added script-based keyboard support for SVG2. People will be creating widgets but our focus will be intractive graphics and charts after we get the core infrasturucture working across browsers. Rocj Rich Schwerdtfeger Inactive hide details for "Schnabel, Stefan" ---12/11/2015 12:01:51 PM---Hi Fred, my developers bother me with the question if "Schnabel, Stefan" ---12/11/2015 12:01:51 PM---Hi Fred, my developers bother me with the question if things like From: "Schnabel, Stefan" <stefan.schnabel@sap.com> To: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, Fred Esch/Arlington/IBM@IBMUS Cc: "public-aria@w3.org" <public-aria@w3.org> Date: 12/11/2015 12:01 PM Subject: ARIA roles in WAI-ARIA Graphics Module working draft Hi Fred, my developers bother me with the question if things like <g role=”button” ….> (and other ARIA roles) are allowed according to http://www.w3.org/TR/graphics-aria-1.0/ or just the roles mentioned there explicitly or other. Can you please clarify? I cannot find a respective section in the document so far that is explicit about that. Background is that rumors are that Adobe already announced SVG as Flash “replacement” and if so, people will start creating “richer” UI’s using SVG also for widgets (which they shouldn’t but they will, I fear). Best Regards Stefan
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
Received on Monday, 4 January 2016 22:12:18 UTC