- From: J. Andrew Rogers <andrew@jarbox.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 09:05:30 -0700
- To: Martin Lechner <martin.lechner@wikitude.com>
- Cc: discussion@arstandards.org, public-ar@w3.org
On May 18, 2012, at 2:44 AM, Martin Lechner wrote: > We focus more on generic tracking (supporting any kind of tracking algorithms in a very generic way), relative positioning, 3D and infrastructure models, level of detail etc. rather than the (already pretty well GML-defined) location-based geometries. We also work on having a descriptive and a scripting part of the language, similar to how HTML and ECMAScript/JavaScript work together as seperate, yet cooperating specs. How well does ARML 2.0 handle streaming delivery? This was always a troublesome limitation of KML because there are quite a number of applications that require a more streaming-oriented model. -- J. Andrew Rogers Twitter: @jandrewrogers
Received on Sunday, 20 May 2012 13:02:14 UTC