Friday, 31 August 2007
- Re: Heads-up: Some buzz about access-control
- Re: widget namespace
- Re: widget namespace
- Re: [Widgets 1.0] Automatic Updates (1.0)?
Thursday, 30 August 2007
- Heads-up: Some buzz about access-control
- Re: widget namespace
- Re: [Widgets 1.0] Automatic Updates (1.0)?
Wednesday, 29 August 2007
- Re: widget namespace
- Re: widget namespace
- Request for Comments on Enabling Read Access for Web Resources
- Re: widget namespace
- Re: widget namespace
- Re: widget namespace
Tuesday, 28 August 2007
- Re: widget namespace
- Re: [Widgets 1.0] Automatic Updates (1.0)?
- Re: [Widgets 1.0] Automatic Updates (1.0)?
- Re: [Widgets 1.0] Automatic Updates (1.0)?
- Re: widget namespace
Monday, 27 August 2007
Friday, 24 August 2007
Thursday, 16 August 2007
Thursday, 9 August 2007
Wednesday, 8 August 2007
- Re: widget namespace
- Re: long HTTP header field name in WD-access-control
- Re: long HTTP header field name in WD-access-control
- Re: ISSUE-12: Widgets: Digital signatures: XML Signature versus PKCS#7 [Web Application Packaging]
- ISSUE-14: Widgets: what mechanism should be used for the Identifier (one option is a URI)? [Web Application Packaging]
- Re: widget namespace
- ISSUE-13: Widgets: do we need to define a mechanism to state that an extension or feature is mandatory? [Web Application Packaging]
- ISSUE-12: Widgets: Digital signatures: XML Signature versus PKCS#7 [Web Application Packaging]