- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 09:47:18 -0400
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, "Yves Lafon" <ylafon@w3.org>, "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>, public-appformats@w3.org
On 7/30/07, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:39:04 +0200, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com> > wrote: > > My .02; I'm not too worried about saving bytes (at least on this scale), > > but I do wonder if that "Content" prefix is justified... > > Hmm, I can find me suggesting the name Content-Access-Control as far back > as 200605 but I'm pretty sure someone else suggested it to me first. I'm > thinking it was Mark Baker, but I can't find the relevant minutes/e-mail. > > (Personally I'd be fine with naming it Access-Control.) I don't think I would have suggested that name. The Content-* headers are defined to be entity headers, whereas Access-Control would presumably be a response header. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca Coactus; Web-inspired integration strategies http://www.coactus.com
Received on Wednesday, 8 August 2007 13:47:26 UTC