- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 08:18:59 +0200
- To: "Marcos Caceres" <marcosscaceres@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Jon Ferraiolo" <jferrai@us.ibm.com>, "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@opera.com>, "WAF WG (public)" <public-appformats@w3.org>, "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
On Thursday, August 30, 2007, 12:16:33 AM, Marcos wrote: MC> HI Chris, >> JF> To me, it is glaringly obvious that a standards organization >> JF> should leverage whatever tools are available to ensure that the >> JF> technologies it defines are robust and extensible. In the realm of >> JF> angle-bracket markup languages, the relevant tools are XML >> JF> namespaces along with a proper schema definition using XML Schema >> JF> or RelaxNG. >> I agree that this (should be) obvious. >> Please put the widget xml in a namespace. A RelaxNG grammar for it >> would also be highly desirable. MC> Thank you for your input. The namespace is now back in the spec. Excellent. That satisfies my comment. MC> Unless Anne can make a convincing case here for taking it out again, I MC> think this matter should now be closed. MC> If anyone else has any arguments for or against a namespace, please MC> send them in regardless. MC> We will likely produce a RelaxNG schema down the track, but it is not MC> a priority right now. I'll ask Art to please record the creation as MC> some sort of schema as an issue or action in the tracker so it's not MC> forgotten about. Thanks, appreciated. The 'Contexts in which this element may be used:' and 'Content model:' as an informal schema look to be a good basis for starting an RNG schema. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2007 06:19:15 UTC