Re: Call for Consensus: Anti-Fraud CG Charter

re: abuse's meaning, Ian's reading is correct. Based on how wide the space
is, the medium-term plan is to try sorting out more explicit use cases and
looking into amending the charter based on that in the future.

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:05 PM Michael Tiffany <michael@humansecurity.com>
wrote:

> +1. I particularly commend the wording scoping the mission. This mission
> statement strikes me as both ambitious and precise. Nicely done.
>
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 1:55 PM Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 15, 2022, at 12:52 PM, James Rosewell <james@51degrees.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > What does "abuse" mean in the context of the charter? Without a
>> definition the "Goals" and "Scope of Work" sections are misaligned.
>>
>> The charter says: "Fraud and abuse can include web activity perpetrated
>> by botnets, attackers impersonating users, unwanted traffic, and other
>> activity that intends to deceive and harm users or compromise web services."
>>
>> I infer that the scope of work is therefore "activity that intends to
>> deceive and harm users or compromise web services.”
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
>> > Sent: 15 February 2022 18:38
>> > To: Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
>> > Cc: public-antifraud@w3.org
>> > Subject: Re: Call for Consensus: Anti-Fraud CG Charter
>> >
>> > +1 to the charter. Thank you to the editors,
>> >
>> > Ian
>> >
>> >> On Feb 15, 2022, at 11:52 AM, Steven Valdez <svaldez@google.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> This email is to announce a Call for Consensus (CfC) on the Anti-Fraud
>> CG Charter:
>> >>
>> >> https://antifraudcg.github.io/charter.html
>> >>
>> >> This charter would serve as an initial foundation for the anti-fraud
>> community group and can be amended in the future as the state of the CG
>> changes.
>> >>
>> >> This CfC will conclude in 14 days on March 1st, 2022. All feedback is
>> encouraged on the charter, both positive support and any objections or
>> request for changes. While non-responses by CG members implies no objection
>> to the charter, the Chairs would prefer explicit support/feedback on the
>> charter to make sure sufficient folks have reviewed/read the charter.
>> Please provide feedback/support by replying to this thread (via
>> public-antifraud@w3.org). If there is consensus for the charter, we'll
>> adopt it at the end of the CfC for the March 4th meeting, otherwise we'll
>> iterate on the feedback via the Github (
>> https://github.com/antifraudcg/antifraudcg.github.io/blob/main/charter.html
>> ).
>> >>
>> >> -Steven
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> Steven Valdez |       Chrome Privacy Sandbox |
>> svaldez@google.com |    Cambridge, MA
>> >
>> > --
>> > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
>> > https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
>> > Tel: +1 917 450 8783 <(917)%20450-8783>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be
>> privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender
>> immediately and do not disclose, use, store or copy the information
>> contained herein. This is an email from 51Degrees.mobi Limited, Davidson
>> House, Forbury Square, Reading, RG1 3EU. T: +44 118 328 7152
>> <+44%20118%20328%207152>; E: info@51degrees.com; 51Degrees.mobi Limited
>> t/as 51Degrees.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
>> https://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs/
>> Tel: +1 917 450 8783 <(917)%20450-8783>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

-- 

 Steven Valdez |  Chrome Privacy Sandbox |  svaldez@google.com |  Cambridge,
MA