Re: [web-annotation] is, has and alike are implied

I propose that we add this to the agenda for 9/16 telco.

Overall, my position hasn't changed (-1 to dropping has from hasFoo), 
but wanted to propose at least a compromise to see if there was any 
agreement.  The rationale for pushing on this now is that it would 
make a BIG change to the next WD if we rename everything, and use a 
new namespace.

GitHub Notif of comment by azaroth42

Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2015 20:20:22 UTC