- From: Frederick Hirsch <hirsch@fjhirsch.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:17:56 -0400
- To: Randall Leeds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Cc: public-annotation@w3.org
+1 > On Sep 9, 2015, at 3:06 PM, Randall Leeds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org> wrote: > > I don't see any problem with "state", "style", "scope", "selector" and > "motivation". I don't have any idea what "narrowerThan" is supposed > to mean. It's so far from comprehensible to me that even knowing what > "hasSource" is I can't figure out how you got "narrowerThan". Again, > "source" would seem fine to me. > > I wish I could find good terms for "annotatedBy" and "serializedBy", > but I'm not sure I can. Simply dropping the "by" makes it unclear > whether this is about who or when or what, etc. I've toyed around with > "author" and "scribe" or such things in my head, but I don't like > anything I've come up with. > > -- > GitHub Notif of comment by tilgovi > See > https://github.com/w3c/web-annotation/issues/70#issuecomment-139013321 > regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch fjhirsch.com @fjhirsch
Received on Wednesday, 9 September 2015 20:18:31 UTC